...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of vascular and interventional radiology: JVIR >Recurrent endoleak detection and measurement of aneurysm size with CTA after coil embolization of endoleaks.
【24h】

Recurrent endoleak detection and measurement of aneurysm size with CTA after coil embolization of endoleaks.

机译:内渗漏的线圈栓塞后,使用CTA进行内渗漏的反复检测和动脉瘤大小的测量。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

PURPOSE: The optimal modality for following aneurysm size and detecting endoleaks after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) remains controversial. Computed tomographic angiography (CTA) has been widely employed but can be limited by metal artifact from stents, which is exacerbated by embolization coils placed during the treatment of type 2 endoleaks. The authors assessed interobserver agreement of CTA for measuring aneurysm size and presence of recurrent endoleak in patients with prior coil embolization of type 2 endoleaks. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 65 CTAs were retrospectively reviewed in a cohort of 27 patients (25 men; two women; mean age, 77.4 years) who had prior endoleak embolization after EVAR. Endoleak embolizations included transarterial (n=8) and translumbar (n=19) approaches. In each patient, maximal aneurysm diameter and presence/absence of recurrent endoleak was measured independently by two observers. Cohen's Kappa statistic was used to assess interobserver agreement, as well as paired two-tailed Student t tests for aneurysm diameter. RESULTS: Recurrent type 2 endoleaks were detected with CTA in eight of 27 patients (30%) and on 13 of 65 CTAs (20%). A high degree of correlation (98.5%) was also seen between the two observers for presence of endoleak (Kappa=0.95). Mean aneurysm diameter for the entire cohort correlated closely between both observers: 54.8 mm+/-1.1 for observer A and 54.9 mm+/-1.1 for observer B (P=.66). There was a disagreement between the readers of greater than 2 mm regarding aneurysm size in 13.8% of the CTAs (nine of 65 CTAs). CONCLUSION: Despite the presence of streak artifact on CTA following coil embolization of type 2 endoleaks, CTA remains a useful study for following patients. The presence of embolization coils does not prevent CTA measurement of aneurysm diameter and detection of recurrent endoleak with a high degree of interobserver agreement.
机译:目的:在血管内动脉瘤修复(EVAR)后,追踪动脉瘤大小和检测内漏的最佳方式仍存在争议。计算机断层血管造影术(CTA)已被广泛使用,但受支架金属假象的限制,在治疗2型内漏时放置的栓塞线圈会加剧这种情况。作者评估了CTA观察者间的一致性,以评估先前有2型内渗的线圈栓塞患者的动脉瘤大小和复发内渗的存在。材料与方法:回顾性分析了EVAR后发生内渗栓塞的27例患者(男性25例;女性2例;平均年龄77.4岁)中的65例CTAs。内漏栓塞包括经动脉(n = 8)和经腰管(n = 19)进路。在每位患者中,由两名观察者独立地测量最大动脉瘤直径和是否存在内漏。使用科恩(Cohen)的Kappa统计量评估观察者之间的一致性,以及用于动脉瘤直径的成对两尾学生t检验。结果:27例患者中的8例(30%)和65例CTAs中的13例(20%)均发现CTA复发性2型内渗。两位观察者之间也发现内漏的存在高度相关性(98.5%)(Kappa = 0.95)。整个队列的平均动脉瘤直径在两个观察者之间密切相关:观察者A为54.8 mm +/- 1.1,观察者B为54.9 mm +/- 1.1(P = .66)。对于13%的CTAs(65个CTA中的9个),动脉瘤大小存在大于2 mm的读者分歧。结论:尽管在2型内漏线圈栓塞后CTA上存在条纹伪影,但CTA对于后续患者仍是一项有用的研究。栓塞线圈的存在并不能阻止观察者之间高度同意的CTA测量动脉瘤直径和检测复发性内漏。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号