...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of vascular and interventional radiology: JVIR >Complications of a percutaneous suture-mediated closure device versus manual compression for arteriotomy closure: a case-controlled study.
【24h】

Complications of a percutaneous suture-mediated closure device versus manual compression for arteriotomy closure: a case-controlled study.

机译:经皮缝线介导的闭合装置与手动加压进行动脉切开术闭合的并发症:病例对照研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: To evaluate the incidence and types of complications encountered with use of a percutaneous suture-mediated closure device versus manual compression for arteriotomy closure in a retrospective case-controlled study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors identified 100 consecutive patients, 15 men and 85 women 21-85 years of age (mean, 50 years), between December 2000 and July 2001 in whom the Closer percutaneous suture-mediated closure device was used during 65 uterine artery embolization (UAE) procedures, 11 hepatic chemoembolization procedures, nine diagnostic angiography procedures, seven peripheral vascular interventions, six visceral arterial interventions, and two thrombolysis procedures. An age-, sex-, and procedure-matched control population was identified in which manual compression was performed. Procedure reports and clinical charts were reviewed for the presence of puncture-site complications, as categorized according to Society of Interventional Radiology reporting standards, and for risk factors and comorbid conditions (hypertension, diabetes, stroke, smoking, and coronary artery disease). Follow-up visits and imaging studies were reviewed for patients with complications. RESULTS: In the Closer group, there were seven device failures, four minor complications, and three major complications. Minor complications included two groin hematomas and two cases of persistent pain at the arteriotomy site. Three major complications consisted of two cases of external iliac artery dissection, one with distal embolization, and one case of common femoral artery (CFA) occlusion and distal embolization. All major complications occurred in women undergoing UAE. One patient required thromboendarterectomy and patch angioplasty to repair the CFA occlusion, as well as amputation of a gangrenous toe. In the manual-compression group, there was one minor complication (a groin hematoma) and no major complications. There were significantly more complications in the Closer group than in the manual compression group(P =.02). CONCLUSIONS: Significantly more complications were associated with use of a percutaneous suture-mediated closure device than with manual compression for arteriotomy-site hemostasis. Major complications and associated morbidity may be seen with use of percutaneous suture-mediated closure devices. In particular, an unexpectedly high frequency of device-related complications was demonstrated in young women undergoing UAE.
机译:目的:在回顾性病例对照研究中,评估经皮缝线介导的闭合装置与手动加压进行动脉切开术闭合所遇到的并发症的发生率和类型。材料与方法:作者确定了2000年12月至2001年7月之间连续100例患者,年龄在21-85岁之间的15例男性和85例女性(平均50岁),其中在65例子宫中使用了Closer经皮缝合线介导的闭合装置动脉栓塞(UAE)程序,11例肝化学栓塞程序,9例诊断性血管造影术程序,7例外周血管介入治疗,6例内脏动脉干预和2例溶栓治疗程序。确定了年龄,性别和手术匹配的对照人群,其中进行了手动压迫。根据介入放射学会报告标准对程序报告和临床图表进行检查,以检查是否存在穿刺部位并发症,并分析危险因素和合并症(高血压,糖尿病,中风,吸烟和冠状动脉疾病)。对有并发症的患者进行随访和影像学检查。结果:在更紧密的组中,有7个设备故障,4个小并发症和3个主要并发症。较小的并发症包括两个腹股沟血肿和两个在动脉切开处持续疼痛的病例。三项主要并发症包括2例外动脉解剖,1例远端栓塞,1例股总动脉闭塞和远端栓塞。所有主要并发症均发生在接受阿联酋的妇女中。一名患者需要进行血栓内膜切除术和补片血管成形术以修复CFA闭塞,并切除坏疽性脚趾。在手压组中,有一个较小的并发症(腹股沟血肿),没有重大并发症。与手动加压组相比,Closer组的并发症显着多(P = .02)。结论:与使用手动加压进行动脉切开术部位止血相比,使用经皮缝合线介导的闭合装置显着增加了更多的并发症。使用经皮缝合线介导的闭合装置可发现主要并发症和相关的发病率。特别是,在接受阿联酋治疗的年轻女性中,设备相关并发症的发生频率出乎意料地高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号