首页> 外文期刊>Journal of toxicology and environmental health, Part B. Critical reviews >Re: Ritter, Leonard, Totman, Celine, Krishnan, Kannan, Carrier, Richard, Vezina, Anne, Morisset, Veronique. (2007). Deriving uncertainty factors for threshold chemical contaminants in drinking water. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part B, 10:527-557.
【24h】

Re: Ritter, Leonard, Totman, Celine, Krishnan, Kannan, Carrier, Richard, Vezina, Anne, Morisset, Veronique. (2007). Deriving uncertainty factors for threshold chemical contaminants in drinking water. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part B, 10:527-557.

机译:回复:里特,伦纳德,托特曼,席琳,克里希南,坎南,承运人,理查德,韦齐纳,安妮,莫里塞特,维罗尼克。 (2007)。得出饮用水中化学污染物阈值的不确定性因素。毒理学与环境健康杂志,B部分,10:527-557。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In Part B, issue 10, at page 527 of this journal, Ritter et al. (2007) analyzed the use of uncertainty factors (UFs) to derive drinking-water guideline values as currently practised in the United States, Canada, and Australia and by the World health Organization (WHO). Default factors of 10 seem to be used most often. For reasons of desired flexibility, often a range of 1-10 and sometimes of 3-10 is considered. This terminology and quantification procedure was also common practice in Germany until the end of the 1990s. Since then, an empirical study has brought about a change. This impulse was the project "Quantification of extrapolation factors," which was supported by the German Federal Environment Agency and accompanied by its toxicologists (Kalberlah & Schneider, 1998: Quantification of extrapolation factors. The final report of is published as research project no. 116 06 113 of the Federal Environmental Agency. Schriftenreihe der Bundesanstalt fur Arbeitsschutz und Arbeitsmedizin, Fb 797, Verlag fur neue Wissenschaft GmbH, Bremerhaven, http://www.nw-verlag.de/ie/ index.htm; for the English version; click on "Shop" and search for the names of the authors).
机译:Ritter等人在本杂志的第527页的B部分第10期中。 (2007年)分析了不确定性因素(UFs)的使用,以得出目前在美国,加拿大和澳大利亚以及世界卫生组织(WHO)实践的饮用水准则值。默认因子10似乎是最常用的。由于期望的灵活性,通常考虑的范围是1-10,有时是3-10。直到1990年代末,这种术语和量化程序在德国也很普遍。从那以后,一项实证研究带来了变化。这种冲动是“外推因子的量化”项目,该项目得到了德国联邦环境署的支持,并得到了毒理学家的陪同(Kalberlah&Schneider,1998:外推因子的量化。最终报告作为第116号研究项目出版。联邦环境保护局06 113,德国联邦议院联邦书院,联邦法院797号,不来梅哈芬出版社,德国,http://www.nw-verlag.de/ie/ index.htm;英文版;点击“商店”并搜索作者姓名)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号