首页> 外文期刊>Journal of trauma & dissociation: the official journal of the International Society for the Study of Dissociation (ISSD) >Deficits in Metacognitive Capacity Are Related to Subjective Distress and Heightened Levels of Hyperarousal Symptoms in Adults With Posttraumatic Stress Disorder
【24h】

Deficits in Metacognitive Capacity Are Related to Subjective Distress and Heightened Levels of Hyperarousal Symptoms in Adults With Posttraumatic Stress Disorder

机译:元认知能力的缺乏与创伤后应激障碍的成年人的主观窘迫和亢奋症状的升高水平有关

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Among persons with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), the severity of symptoms and concurrent distress are not fully explained by trauma severity. Interest has consequently arisen in the psychological processes that cause distress and heighten PTSD symptoms. This study accordingly sought to examine whether differences in metacognitive capacity are related to levels of emotional distress, avoidanceumbing, and hyperarousal. Participants were 48 adults with a confirmed diagnosis of PTSD. Comparison groups included 51 adults with HIV and 183 with schizophrenia. Metacognition, emotion recognition, depression, and emotional distress and levels of avoidanceumbing and hyperarousal were assessed concurrently using the Metacognition Assessment Scale-Abbreviated, the Bell Lysaker Emotion Recognition Test, the Beck Depression Inventory, and the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale. Results revealed that the PTSD group had better ratings of overall metacognitive capacity than the schizophrenia group and specifically poorer levels of metacognitive mastery, or the ability to use metacognitive knowledge to respond to challenges, than the HIV group. Within the PTSD group, poorer metacognitive mastery was linked with greater distress and higher hyperarousal when depression was controlled for statistically. Emotion recognition was not linked with distress or symptom severity. Results are consistent with models in which symptom severity in PTSD is related to the extent to which persons can use knowledge of themselves and others to find ways to respond to distress that match their own unique needs.
机译:在创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)患者中,创伤的严重程度不能完全解释症状的严重程度和并发的困扰。因此,人们对引起困扰并加剧PTSD症状的心理过程产生了兴趣。因此,本研究试图检验元认知能力的差异是否与情绪困扰,回避/麻木和过度兴奋有关。参加者为48位确诊为PTSD的成年人。比较组包括51名成人HIV感染者和183名精神分裂症患者。同时使用缩略的元认知评估量表,贝尔·莱瑟克情绪识别测验,贝克抑郁量表和临床医生管理的PTSD量表同时评估元认知,情绪识别,抑郁和情绪困扰以及回避/麻木和亢奋的程度。结果显示,PTSD组比精神分裂症组具有更好的整体元认知能力评级,尤其是与HIV组相比,元认知能力或使用元认知知识应对挑战的能力更差。在PTSD组中,统计上控制抑郁时,较弱的元认知能力与更大的困扰和更高的兴奋度相关。情绪识别与痛苦或症状严重程度无关。结果与模型相一致,在模型中,PTSD的症状严重程度与人们可以利用自己和他人的知识找到满足自己独特需求的应对方式的程度有关。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号