...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis >Comparison of GP IIB/IIIA inhibitors and their activity as measured by aggregometry, flow cytometry, single platelet counting, and the rapid platelet function analyzer.
【24h】

Comparison of GP IIB/IIIA inhibitors and their activity as measured by aggregometry, flow cytometry, single platelet counting, and the rapid platelet function analyzer.

机译:比较GP IIB / IIIA抑制剂及其活性,通过凝集测定法,流式细胞仪,单血小板计数和快速血小板功能分析仪进行测定。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BACKGROUND: GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors have primarily been used short-term e.g., during PTCA. They failed to show clinical benefit during long-term therapy. One reason might be the absence of a method to monitor inhibitor activity. This study compared platelet aggregometry, the rapid platelet function analyzer (RPFA) test, single platelet counting, and flow cytometric determination of receptor occupancy to measure GP IIb/IIIa-receptor inhibitor activity. METHODS: Increasing doses of abciximab, tirofiban, and eptifibatide were added to whole blood in vitro. Whole blood was used for the RPFA, for single platelet counting and flow cytometry. Platelet rich plasma was prepared for aggregometry. RESULTS: The correlation between aggregometry and RPFA results was linear for abciximab and eptifibatide. Tirofiban was a stronger inhibitor with the RPFA (IC(50) 7.7nM) than with aggregometry (IC(50) 19.6nM). The single platelet counting technique showed that even supratherapeutic concentrations of all three inhibitors could not completely suppress microaggregation. Abciximab concentrations that were equipotent to tirofiban with aggregometry were less potent with regards to the inhibition of microaggregation. This difference was more pronounced with TRAP induced microaggregation than with ADP. The flow cytometric receptor occupancy test showed that occupancy was 95% with 5 microg/ml abciximab and almost 97% with 10 microg/ml. Tirofiban reached a maximum receptor occupancy of 56%, eptifibatide 64%. CONCLUSIONS: While aggregometry is time consuming the RPFA provides results fast and with little variability. There is still a discrepancy between aggregometry and RPFA results for tirofiban. The single platelet counting technique detects the inhibition of microaggregation the relevance of which for the clinical outcome is not known. The flow cytometric receptor occupancy assay is best suited for abciximab.
机译:背景:GP IIb / IIIa抑制剂主要是短期使用的,例如在PTCA期间使用。他们在长期治疗期间未显示出临床益处。原因之一可能是缺乏监测抑制剂活性的方法。这项研究比较了血小板凝集,快速血小板功能分析仪(RPFA)测试,单个血小板计数和流式细胞术测定受体的占有率,以测量GP IIb / IIIa-受体抑制剂的活性。方法:在体外向全血中增加剂量的阿昔单抗,替罗非班和依替巴肽。全血用于RPFA,用于单血小板计数和流式细胞仪。准备富血小板血浆用于凝集测定法。结果:阿昔单抗和依替巴肽的凝集测定与RPFA结果之间呈线性关系。替罗非班是RPFA(IC(50)7.7nM)的强抑制剂,比凝集法(IC(50)19.6nM)更强。单一的血小板计数技术表明,即使是全部三种抑制剂的超治疗浓度也不能完全抑制微聚集。在凝集测定法上与替罗非班等效的阿昔单抗浓度在抑制微聚集方面作用较小。 TRAP诱导的微聚集比ADP更明显。流式细胞仪受体占用率测试显示,阿昔单抗5微克/毫升占95%,而10微克/毫升占近97%。替罗非班的最大受体占有率为56%,依替巴肽为64%。结论:尽管凝集测定很耗时,但RPFA可以快速且几乎没有变异地提供结果。替罗非班的凝集测定和RPFA结果之间仍然存在差异。单一血小板计数技术可检测微聚集的抑制作用,其与临床结果的相关性尚不清楚。流式细胞仪受体测定法最适合于阿昔单抗。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号