...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of thoracic oncology: official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer >Randomized study of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial biopsy: Thin bronchoscopic method versus guide sheath method
【24h】

Randomized study of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial biopsy: Thin bronchoscopic method versus guide sheath method

机译:支气管内超声引导下经支气管活检的随机研究:细支气管镜法与引导鞘法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

In endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial biopsy (EBUS-TBB), techniques using a thin bronchoscope or a guide sheath have been proposed for accurate biopsy instrument reinsertion into the bronchial route indicated by a radial ultrasonic probe. The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic yields of these techniques for peripheral pulmonary lesions. Methods: Patients with suspected peripheral pulmonary lesions were included in this prospective, randomized, noninferiority study and assigned to undergo EBUS-TBB under fluoroscopic guidance using a prototype 3.4-mm thin bronchoscope or a 4.0-mm bronchoscope with a guide sheath. Results: A total of 205 patients were enrolled and randomized, of whom 203 patients (101 thin bronchoscopic method; 102 guide sheath method) were included in the analysis. Diagnostic histologic specimens were obtained in 65% (41% for benign and 75% for malignant lesions) of the thin bronchoscopy group and 62% (25% for benign and 71% for malignant lesions) of the guide sheath group. Diagnostic performance of the thin bronchoscopic method was confirmed to be noninferior to the guide sheath method (difference in diagnostic yields, 3.6%; 90% confidence interval, -7.5 to 14.7%). Mean procedure time was significantly shorter in the thin bronchoscopy group than the guide sheath group (27 versus 33 minutes; p = 0.002). Complications including pneumothorax, moderate bleeding, and pneumonia occurred in 5% and 2% in the respective groups (p = 0.28). Conclusions: EBUS-TBB using the thin bronchoscope was noninferior to the guide sheath method for the diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary lesions and was associated with shorter procedural time.
机译:在支气管内超声引导的经支气管活检(EBUS-TBB)中,已经提出了使用细支气管镜或引导鞘的技术,以将活检器械准确地重新插入由放射状超声探头指示的支气管路径中。这项研究的目的是比较这些技术对周围肺部病变的诊断率。方法:本前瞻性,随机,非劣效性研究包括可疑的周围性肺部病变患者,并接受他们在3.4毫米薄型支气管镜或带引导鞘的4.0毫米支气管镜的荧光检查下接受EBUS-TBB治疗。结果:共有205例患者入选并随机分组,其中203例(101细支气管镜法; 102引导鞘管法)被纳入分析。薄型支气管镜检查组的诊断组织学标本占65%(良性41%,恶性病变75%),引导鞘管组62%(良性25%,恶性病变71%)。证实细支气管镜法的诊断性能不逊于引导鞘管法(诊断率差异为3.6%;置信区间为90%,-7.5至14.7%)。细支气管镜检查组的平均手术时间明显短于引导鞘管组(27分钟vs 33分钟; p = 0.002)。在各组中,包括气胸,中度出血和肺炎在内的并发症发生率分别为5%和2%(p = 0.28)。结论:使用细支气管镜的EBUS-TBB在诊断周围型肺部病变方面不逊于引导鞘法,而且手术时间更短。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号