首页> 外文期刊>Journal of thoracic oncology: official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer >Health-related quality-of-life in a randomized phase III first-line study of gefitinib versus carboplatin/paclitaxel in clinically selected patients from Asia with advanced NSCLC (IPASS).
【24h】

Health-related quality-of-life in a randomized phase III first-line study of gefitinib versus carboplatin/paclitaxel in clinically selected patients from Asia with advanced NSCLC (IPASS).

机译:吉非替尼与卡铂/紫杉醇在亚洲晚期NSCLC(IPASS)临床患者中进行的随机III期一线研究中与健康相关的生活质量。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

INTRODUCTION: Evaluation of health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) and symptom improvement were preplanned secondary objectives for the overall population and posthoc analyses for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positiveegative subgroups in IPASS. METHODS: HRQoL was assessed using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung (FACT-L) and Trial Outcome Index (TOI); symptom improvement by the Lung Cancer Subscale (LCS). Improvements defined as: 6 or more (FACT-L; TOI), 2 or more (LCS) points increase maintained for 21 or more days. RESULTS: Overall (n = 1151/1217 evaluable), HRQoL improvement rates were significantly greater with gefitinib versus carboplatin/paclitaxel; symptom improvement rates were similar for both treatments. Significantly more patients recorded improvements in HRQoL and symptoms with gefitinib in the EGFR mutation-positive subgroup (n = 259; FACT-L 70.2% versus 44.5%; odds ratio, 3.01 [95% confidence interval, 1.79-5.07]; p < 0.001; TOI 70.2% versus 38.3%; 3.96 [2.33-6.71]; p < 0.001; LCS 75.6% versus 53.9%; 2.70 [1.58-4.62]; p < 0.001), and with carboplatin/paclitaxel in the EGFR mutation-negative subgroup (n = 169; FACT-L 14.6% versus 36.3%; odds ratio, 0.31 [0.15-0.65]; p = 0.002; TOI 12.4% versus 28.8%; 0.35 [0.16-0.79]; p = 0.011; LCS 20.2% versus 47.5%; 0.28 [0.14-0.55]; p < 0.001). Median time-to-worsening (months) FACT-L score was longer with gefitinib versus carboplatin/paclitaxel for the overall population (8.3 versus 2.5) and EGFR mutation-positive subgroup (15.6 versus 3.0), and similar for both treatments in the EGFR mutation-negative subgroup (1.4 versus 1.4). Median time-to-improvement with gefitinib was 8 days in patients with EGFR mutation-positive tumors who improved. CONCLUSIONS: HRQoL and symptom endpoints were consistent with efficacy outcomes in IPASS and favored gefitinib in patients with EGFR mutation-positive tumors and carboplatin/paclitaxel in patients with EGFR mutation-negative tumors.
机译:简介:对健康相关的生活质量(HRQoL)和症状改善的评估是总体人群的预先计划的次要目标,是IPASS中表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变阳性/阴性亚组的事后分析。方法:使用癌症治疗肺功能评估(FACT-L)和试验结果指数(TOI)评估HRQoL;肺癌子量表(LCS)改善症状。改进定义为:6个或更多(FACT-L; TOI),2个或更多(LCS)积分增加持续21天或更多天。结果:总体(n = 1151/1217可评估),吉非替尼与卡铂/紫杉醇相比,HRQoL改善率明显更高;两种疗法的症状改善率相似。 EGFR突变阳性亚组中吉非替尼组的患者的HRQoL和症状明显改善(n = 259; FACT-L 70.2%vs 44.5%;优势比为3.01 [95%置信区间为1.79-5.07]; p <0.001 ; TOI 70.2%对38.3%; 3.96 [2.33-6.71]; p <0.001; LCS 75.6%对53.9%; 2.70 [1.58-4.62]; p <0.001),并且在EGFR突变阴性亚组中使用卡铂/紫杉醇(n = 169; FACT-L 14.6%对36.3%;优势比,0.31 [0.15-0.65]; p = 0.002; TOI 12.4%对28.8%; 0.35 [0.16-0.79]; p = 0.011; LCS 20.2%对47.5%; 0.28 [0.14-0.55]; p <0.001)。吉非替尼相对于卡铂/紫杉醇的总体人群(8.3比2.5)和EGFR突变阳性亚组(15.6比3.0)的FACT-L评分中位时间更长(几个月),并且两种疗法在EGFR中相似突变阴性亚组(1.4对1.4)。 EGFR突变阳性肿瘤患者的吉非替尼改善时间中位数为8天。结论:HRQoL和症状终点与IPASS的疗效结果一致,吉非替尼在EGFR突变阳性肿瘤患者和卡铂/紫杉醇在EGFR突变阴性肿瘤患者中是一致的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号