首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Vegetation Science >Patterns of weed co-occurrence at the field and landscape level.
【24h】

Patterns of weed co-occurrence at the field and landscape level.

机译:在田间和景观水平上杂草共生的模式。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Question: Are patterns of weed co-occurrence structured or random Do these patterns differ at the field and landscape scales Are co-occurrence patterns related to the effect of environmental filters and/or competition Location: France. Methods: Weed communities were surveyed in 3008 4-m2 plots, i.e. 32 plots per field in 94 winter-wheat fields located in the same landscape. We estimated patterns of species co-occurrence (C-score) at the field and landscape level. Additional characteristics of weed communities (degree of habitat specialization, competitive ability) and sampled fields (within-field and among-fields environmental heterogeneity) were used to interpret observed co-occurrence patterns at both scales. Results: Non-randomness was detected in <20% of the fields; these fields were characterized by higher within-field environmental heterogeneity and contained a higher proportion of competitive species. This subset of fields partly drove the pattern of co-occurrence of weed species at the landscape scale. After removing this effect, specialist species were found to be aggregated and species that had an intermediate degree of habitat specialization were segregated, despite the lack of marked environmental gradients across the studied landscape. Conclusions: Patterns of weed co-occurrence differed at the field and landscape scales. Weeds co-occurred mostly randomly within fields but were in some instances segregated as a result of environmental heterogeneity and possibly weed-weed competition. At the landscape scale, aggregation of specialist species and segregation of intermediate species are likely to result from variations in crop management among the sampled fields.
机译:问题:杂草共生的模式是结构化的还是随机的?这些模式在田间和景观尺度上是否不同?共生的模式与环境过滤器和/或竞争的影响有关吗?位置:法国。方法:在3008个4-m 2 样地中对杂草群落进行了调查,即在同一景观的94个冬小麦田中,每个田地32个田地。我们估计了田间和景观水平上物种共生的模式(C得分)。杂草群落的其他特征(生境专业化程度,竞争能力)和采样田地(田间和田间环境异质性)被用来解释两个尺度上观察到的共生模式。结果:在<20%的字段中检测到非随机性;这些田地的特点是田间环境异质性较高,竞争物种所占比例更高。这部分田地在某种程度上推动了杂草物种在景观尺度上的共生模式。消除这种影响后,尽管在研究的景观中缺乏明显的环境梯度,但发现专家物种被聚集,并且具有中等程度生境专业化的物种被隔离。结论:杂草共生的模式在田间和景观尺度上是不同的。杂草主要在田间随机发生,但在某些情况下由于环境异质性和杂草竞争而被隔离。在景观尺度上,专业物种的聚集和中间物种的分离很可能是由于采样田间作物管理的变化而引起的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号