首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Vegetation Science >Updating vegetation classifications: an example with New Zealand's woody vegetation.
【24h】

Updating vegetation classifications: an example with New Zealand's woody vegetation.

机译:更新植被分类:以新西兰的木质植被为例。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Questions: How can existing vegetation classifications be updated when new plot data are obtained Can we use the properties of plots classed as outliers to identify gaps in our understanding of vegetation patterns and so direct future enquiry Location: New Zealand. Methods: We updated a pre-existing classification of New Zealand's forests and shrublands based on a nationally representative data set (1177 plots) by using 12 374 additional plot records from New Zealand's National Vegetation Survey Databank (NVS). We resampled the NVS plot records to remove uneven representation along floristic and geographic gradients. To update the classification at the alliance level, we first cast the original classification into the fuzzy classification framework of Noise Clustering and then discarded original types with low plot numbers and high compositional variation. We then used the plot records that could not be assigned to any original alliance to define new alliances, while retaining the original alliances as fixed elements. We also defined vegetation associations to create a classification at a lower level of abstraction and related it to the classification at the alliance level. Finally, we determined whether known rare types were represented among the new vegetation types and characterized plot records classed as outliers. Results: After casting the 24 original alliances in the NC framework, we discarded seven. We extended the 17 remaining alliances with 12 new ones and defined 79 associations. All 12 new alliances had extents <120 986 ha, which is smaller than the original alliances, and included rare types that were known to exist but could not be defined using the objectively sampled data set underpinning the original classification. Plot records classed as outliers tended to occur at lower altitudes or in successional shrublands. Further sampling is required to adequately define vegetation types in such situations, although composition may be inherently erratic in successional shrublands. Conclusions: Our analysis illustrates the application of a fuzzy classification framework at a national scale and provides a model for others wishing to extend and update vegetation classifications. Our approach allows rare community types to be defined and identifies portions of compositional and geographic gradients that are poorly documented.Digital Object Identifier http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-1103.2012.01450.x
机译:问题:当获得新的样地数据时,如何更新现有的植被分类?我们可以利用被分类为异常值的样地的特性来识别我们对植被格局的了解方面的差距,以便直接进行未来的研究地点:新西兰。方法:我们使用来自新西兰国家植被调查数据库(NVS)的12 374条其他地块记录,基于全国代表性的数据集(1177个地块),更新了新西兰森林和灌木丛的现有分类。我们对NVS图记录进行了重新采样,以消除沿植物和地理梯度的不均匀表示。为了在联盟级别更新分类,我们首先将原始分类转换为“噪声聚类”的模糊分类框架,然后丢弃具有低地积编号和高成分变化的原始类型。然后,我们使用无法分配给任何原始联盟的情节记录来定义新联盟,同时将原始联盟保留为固定元素。我们还定义了植被关联,以在较低的抽象级别上创建分类,并将其与联盟级别上的分类相关联。最后,我们确定在新的植被类型和分类为异常值的特征记录中是否代表了已知的稀有类型。结果:在NC框架中铸造了24个原始联盟后,我们丢弃了7个。我们将剩下的17个联盟扩展了12个新联盟,并定义了79个协会。所有12个新联盟的范围都小于<120 986公顷,小于原始联盟,并且包括已知存在但无法使用原始分类基础的客观抽样数据集进行定义的稀有类型。被归类为离群值的绘图记录倾向于发生在较低的高度或连续的灌木丛中。尽管在连续的灌木丛中成分可能固有地不稳定,但仍需要进一步采样以充分定义植被类型。结论:我们的分析说明了模糊分类框架在全国范围内的应用,并为其他希望扩展和更新植被分类的模型提供了模型。我们的方法允许定义稀有的社区类型,并识别组成和地理梯度很少记录的部分。数字对象标识符http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-1103.2012.01450.x

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号