首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Vegetation Science >Plant characteristics are poor predictors of microsite colonization during the first two years of primary succession.
【24h】

Plant characteristics are poor predictors of microsite colonization during the first two years of primary succession.

机译:在原始演替的头两年中,植物特征不能很好地预测微地点定植。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Questions: Do plant characteristics predict microsite colonization in severe habitats dominated by abiotic factors? Specifically, does colonization of microsites differ among shrubs, forbs and grasses or between wind- and water-dispersed plants, non-native and native plants, or N-fixing and non-N-fixing plants? Location: Kowhai River floodplain, Kaikoura, South Island, New Zealand. Methods: Five microsite characteristics were measured for >1000 individuals representing 27 colonizing plant species on a two-year old surface of a primary succession on a New Zealand floodplain. The microsite characteristics included surface contour (convex, concave, or flat), the position of the plant (e.g., upstream, downstream) relative to the closest rock with >20 cm maximum dimension, the distance to that same rock, the depth of the base of the stem below the surface of a plane resting on the adjacent microrelief, and soil particle size (gravel, pebbles or sand). Results: All plants preferred concave microsites near large rocks relative to systematically placed null points. We found no clear preferences for microhabitats by dispersal mode, native vs. non-native status, or plants with or without nitrogen-fixing symbionts, but grasses preferentially colonized fine soil particles. Highly variable responses among species contributed to these results. Better predictability of microsite preference was obtained for individual species than for plants grouped by characteristics. Conclusions: Our results suggest that in severe habitats with strong abiotic filters and low microsite availability, such as found in early primary succession, coarse categories of species characteristics are poor predictors of colonization success..
机译:问题:植物特征是否可以预测在以非生物因子为主的严重栖息地中的微地点定居?具体地说,灌木,前茅和草丛中或微风和水分散性植物,非本地植物和本地植物,或固氮和非固氮植物之间的微地点定居是否有所不同?地点:新西兰南岛凯库拉的科瓦河河漫滩。方法:在新西兰洪泛区一次演替的两年岁表面上,对代表27种定殖植物物种的1000多个个体进行了5个微站点特征的测量。微场所的特征包括表面轮廓(凸,凹或平坦),植物相对于最大尺寸大于20厘米的最近岩石的位置(例如上游,下游),与同一岩石的距离,靠近相邻微浮雕的平面表面下方的茎基部,以及土壤颗粒大小(碎石,小卵石或沙子)。结果:相对于系统放置的零点,所有植物都偏爱大岩石附近的凹形微场所。我们没有发现通过散布方式,自然状态与非自然状态,或具有或不具有固氮共生体的植物对微生境的明确偏好,但草优先占据了土壤细颗粒。物种间高度可变的响应促成了这些结果。与按特性分组的植物相比,单个物种具有更好的可预测性。结论:我们的研究结果表明,在严重的生境中,这些生境具有很强的非生物滤池和较低的微场所利用率(例如在早期一次演替中发现),物种特征的粗略分类不能很好地预测定植成功。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号