...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the North American Benthological Society >First audit of macroinvertebrate samples from an EU Water Framework Directive monitoring program: human error greatly lowers precision of assessment results
【24h】

First audit of macroinvertebrate samples from an EU Water Framework Directive monitoring program: human error greatly lowers precision of assessment results

机译:首次对欧盟水框架指令监控程序中的无脊椎动物样本进行审核:人为错误大大降低了评估结果的准确性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Invertebrates are often used in biological monitoring of soil and water ecosystems. Because of the huge number of invertebrate species, sample processing (sorting and identification) is a labor-intensive and often difficult task that is prone to error. These errors can bias assessment results, which often are used by environmental managers to guide funding decisions for costly restoration measures. However, quality control of assessment results is not implemented in many freshwater monitoring programs. We conducted the first audit of an official European freshwater monitoring program based on 414 macroinvertebrate samples from streams and rivers in Germany. The samples were collected by personnel at 7 different commercial environmental laboratories using the European Union (EU) Water Framework Directive protocol. We audited 12% of all samples at 3 different levels: 1) a sorting audit, 2) an identification audit, and 3) a total audit based on both sorting and identification. The sorting audit revealed that 29% of the specimens and every 5~(th) taxon (20.6%) had been overlooked by the primary analyst. Differences in sorting were correlated with taxon body size (r = 0.61, p &l, 0.001). The identification audit showed that .30% of taxa differed between the results of the primary analysts and auditors. Taxa considered difficult to identify were not more prone to error than were taxa considered easier to identify. Primary analysts and auditors assigned 34% of audited samples to different quality classes in ≥1 of 3 assessment modules (organic pollution, acidification, and general degradation). For 16% of the samples, these changes resulted in a different final ecological assessment. Such a high rate of differences between primary analysts and auditors could lead to ineffective allocation of several million Euros. Our results clearly illustrate the need for adequate quality control and auditing in freshwater monitoring.
机译:无脊椎动物常用于土壤和水生态系统的生物监测。由于无脊椎动物种类繁多,因此样品处理(分类和鉴定)是一项劳动密集型且通常很困难的工作,容易出错。这些错误可能会使评估结果产生偏差,而环境管理人员通常会使用这些结果来指导昂贵的修复措施的资金决策。但是,许多淡水监测计划并未执行评估结果的质量控制。我们对来自德国溪流和河流的414种无脊椎动物的欧洲淡水监测计划进行了首次审计。样品是由7个不同的商业环境实验室的人员使用欧盟(EU)水框架指令协议收集的。我们在3个不同级别上对所有样本的12%进行了审核:1)分类审核,2)识别审核和3)基于分类和识别的全面审核。分类审核发现,主要分析人员忽略了29%的标本和每5个分类单元(20.6%)。分类的差异与分类单元的体型相关(r = 0.61,p <0.001)。鉴定审核表明,主要分析师和审核员的结果之间有0.30%的分类单元不同。被认为难以识别的分类单元比被认为易于识别的分类单元更不容易出错。初级分析师和审计师在3个评估模块中的≥1(有机污染,酸化和一般降解)中将34%的经审计样品分配给不同的质量等级。对于16%的样本,这些变化导致了不同的最终生态评估。主要分析师与审计师之间如此之高的差异率可能导致数百万欧元的无效分配。我们的结果清楚地说明了淡水监测中需要进行适当的质量控制和审核。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号