首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the Neurological Sciences: Official Bulletin of the World Federation of Neurology >Can Awaji ALS criteria provide earlier diagnosis than the revised El Escorial criteria?
【24h】

Can Awaji ALS criteria provide earlier diagnosis than the revised El Escorial criteria?

机译:Awaji ALS标准能否提供比修订的El Escorial标准更早的诊断?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

BACKGROUND: Recently, new electrophysiological ALS criteria incorporating fasciculation potentials (FPs) as evidence for lower motor neuron signs (Awaji Criteria (AC)) was proposed to provide earlier detection of early-stage ALS than revised El Escorial electrophysiological criteria (REEC). However, serial electrophysiological analysis is lacking to ascertain the original intention. The objective for this study was to elucidate whether electrophysiological criteria set for AC detects ALS earlier than REEC's counterpart in patients with ALS. METHODS: Of the 51 patients who were clinically suspected of ALS, 35 patients prospectively received serial electrophysiological studies every 3 months until (1) both electrophysiological AC and REEC criteria were met in more than two muscles representing both of the cervical and lumbosacral segments or (2) either clinically definite or clinically probable REEC criteria was met. The intervals were determined between the initial disease onset and when the respective electrophysiological criteria were met. RESULTS: Electrophysiological diagnostic criteria were met in 94.3% by AC and 40% by REEC at the initial visits. The intervals between the disease onset and the time of meeting the electrophysiological criteria were shorter in AC (mean: 9.0 months) than in REEC (mean: 15.2 months) (P<0.01). Eleven patients who met only AC electrophysiological criteria on the initial study subsequently met REEC electrophysiological criteria with the mean interval of 3.8 months. A higher percentage of bulbar-type ALS (83.3%) met AC than limb-onset ALS (43.4%) (P<0.05). FPs tended to be more frequently observed than fib/psw in the muscles outside the region of initial clinical onset. CONCLUSION: Electrophysiological criteria of AC were met earlier than that of REEC in ALS patients, especially in patients with bulbar onset. Early recognition of ALS by AC may allow effective therapeutic intervention in the early disease stage.
机译:背景:最近,提出了一种新的电生理ALS标准,该标准结合了絮凝电位(FPs)作为较低的运动神经元体征的证据(淡路标准(AC)),以提供比修订的El Escorial电生理标准(REEC)更早的早期ALS检测。但是,缺乏连续的电生理分析来确定最初的意图。这项研究的目的是阐明针对AC设置的电生理标准是否比ALS患者的REEC同行更早检测到ALS。方法:在51名临床上被怀疑患有ALS的患者中,有35名患者每3个月接受一次连续电生理研究,直到(1)代表颈椎和腰s段的两个以上肌肉中的电生理AC和REEC标准均达到或2)符合临床确定或临床可能的REEC标准。在最初的疾病发作和满足各自的电生理标准之间确定间隔。结果:初诊时AC达到94.3%的电生理诊断标准,REEC达到40%的电生理诊断标准。在AC中,疾病发作与达到电生理标准时间之间的间隔(平均:9.0个月)比在RECE中(平均:15.2个月)要短(P <0.01)。最初研究中仅符合AC电生理标准的11名患者随后符合REEC电生理标准,平均间隔为3.8个月。满足AC的延髓型ALS(83.3%)比肢体发作ALS(43.4%)更高(P <0.05)。在最初临床发作区域以外的肌肉中,FPs的发生频率往往高于fib / psw。结论:在ALS患者中,尤其是在延髓发作的患者中,AC的电生理标准要早于REEC。 AC对ALS的早期识别可能会在疾病的早期阶段进行有效的治疗干预。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号