...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the National Cancer Institute >Neoadjuvant vinorelbine-capecitabine versus docetaxel-doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide in early nonresponsive breast cancer: phase III randomized GeparTrio trial.
【24h】

Neoadjuvant vinorelbine-capecitabine versus docetaxel-doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide in early nonresponsive breast cancer: phase III randomized GeparTrio trial.

机译:新的长春瑞滨-卡培他滨与多西他赛-阿霉素-环磷酰胺在早期无反应性乳腺癌中的疗效:III期随机GeparTrio试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND: Among breast cancer patients, nonresponse to initial neoadjuvant chemotherapy is associated with unfavorable outcome. We compared the response of nonresponding patients who continued the same treatment with that of patients who switched to a well-tolerated non-cross-resistant regimen. METHODS: Previously untreated breast cancer patients received two 3-week cycles of docetaxel at 75 mg/m(2), doxorubicin at 50 mg/m(2), and cyclophosphamide at 500 mg/m(2) per day (TAC). Patients whose tumors did not decrease in size by at least 50% were randomly assigned to four additional cycles of TAC or to four cycles of vinorelbine at 25 mg/m(2) and capecitabine at 2000 mg/m(2) (NX). The outcome was sonographic response, defined as a reduction in the product of the two largest perpendicular diameters by at least 50%. A difference of 10% or less in the sonographic response qualified as noninferiority of the NX treatment. Pathological complete response was defined as no invasive or in situ residual tumor masses in the breast and lymph nodes. Toxic effects were assessed. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: Of 2090 patients enrolled in the GeparTrio study, 622 (29.8%) who did not respond to two initial cycles of TAC were randomly assigned to an additional four cycles of TAC (n = 321) or to four cycles of NX (n = 301). Sonographic response rate was 50.5% for the TAC arm and 51.2% for the NX arm. The difference of 0.7% (95% confidence interval = -7.1% to 8.5%) demonstrated noninferiority of NX (P = .008). Similar numbers of patients in both arms received breast-conserving surgery (184 [57.3%] in the TAC arm vs 180 [59.8%] in the NX arm) and had a pathological complete response (5.3% vs 6.0%). Fewer patients in the NX arm than in the TAC arm had hematologic toxic effects, mucositis, infections, and nail changes, but more had hand-foot syndrome and sensory neuropathy. CONCLUSION: Pathological complete responses to both regimens were marginal. Among patients who did not respond to the initial neoadjuvant TAC treatment, similar efficacy but better tolerability was observed by switching to NX than continuing with TAC.
机译:背景:在乳腺癌患者中,对初始新辅助化疗无反应与不良预后相关。我们比较了继续治疗的无反应患者和改用耐受性良好的非交叉耐药方案的患者的反应。方法:以前未经治疗的乳腺癌患者每天接受两个3周周期的多西他赛,剂量为75 mg / m(2),阿霉素为50 mg / m(2),环磷酰胺为500 mg / m(2)每天(TAC)。肿瘤大小未减少至少50%的患者被随机分配到另外四个TAC周期或长春瑞滨以25 mg / m(2)和卡培他滨为2000 mg / m(2)(NX)的四个周期。结果是超声响应,定义为两个最大垂直直径乘积的降低至少50%。超声反应的差异小于或等于10%可以认为是NX治疗的非劣效性。病理完全缓解定义为在乳腺和淋巴结中没有浸润性或原位残留的肿瘤块。评估毒性作用。所有统计检验都是双面的。结果:在GeparTrio研究的2090名患者中,有622名(29.8%)对最初的两个TAC疗程无反应,被随机分配了另外四个TAC(n = 321)或四个NX(n = 301)。 TAC组的超声响应率为50.5%,NX组的超声响应率为51.2%。 0.7%的差异(95%的置信区间= -7.1%至8.5%)证明了NX的自卑感(P = .008)。两组患者中有相似数量的患者接受了保乳手术(TAC组为184人[57.3%],而NX组为180人[59.8%]),并且病理完全缓解(5.3%对6.0%)。与血液学毒性反应,粘膜炎,感染和指甲改变相比,NX组的患者少于TAC组,但更多的患者患有手足综合征和感觉神经病。结论:两种方案的病理完全反应均较差。在最初对新辅助TAC治疗无反应的患者中,与继续进行TAC相比,改用NX观察到相似的疗效,但耐受性更好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号