...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the National Cancer Institute >Impact of adjuvant chemotherapy and surgical staging in early-stage ovarian carcinoma: European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Adjuvant ChemoTherapy in Ovarian Neoplasm trial.
【24h】

Impact of adjuvant chemotherapy and surgical staging in early-stage ovarian carcinoma: European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Adjuvant ChemoTherapy in Ovarian Neoplasm trial.

机译:辅助化学疗法和手术分期对早期卵巢癌的影响:欧洲组织在卵巢肿瘤试验中进行癌症辅助化学治疗的研究和治疗。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: All randomized trials of adjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage ovarian cancer have lacked the statistical power to show a difference in the effect on survival between adjuvant chemotherapy and no adjuvant chemotherapy. They have also not taken into account the adequacy of surgical staging. We performed a prospective unblinded, randomized phase III trial to test the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with early-stage ovarian cancer, with emphasis on the extent of surgical staging. METHODS: Between November 1990 and January 2000, 448 patients from 40 centers in nine European countries were randomly assigned to either adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy (n = 224) or observation (n = 224) following surgery. Endpoints were overall survival and recurrence-free survival, and the analysis was on an intention-to-treat basis. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to perform time-to-event analysis, and the log-rank test was used to compare differences between treatment arms. Statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 5.5 years, the difference in overall survival between the two trial arms was not statistically significant (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.69, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.44 to 1.08; P =.10). Recurrence-free survival, however, was statistically significantly improved in the adjuvant chemotherapy arm (HR = 0.63, 95% CI = 0.43 to 0.92; P =.02). Approximately one-third of patients (n = 151) had been optimally staged and two-thirds (n = 297) had not. Among patients in the observation arm, optimal staging was associated with a statistically significant improvement in overall and recurrence-free survival (HR = 2.31 [95% CI = 1.08 to 4.96]; P =.03 and HR = 1.82 [95% CI = 1.02 to 3.24] P =.04, respectively). No such association was observed in the chemotherapy arm. In the non-optimally staged patients, adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with statistically significant improvements in overall and recurrence-free survival (HR = 1.75 [95% CI = 1.04 to 2.95]; P =.03 and HR = 1.78 [95% CI = 1.15 to 2.77]; P =.009, respectively). In the optimally staged patients, no benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy was seen. CONCLUSION: Adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with statistically significantly improved recurrence-free survival in patients with early-stage ovarian cancer. The benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy appeared to be limited to patients with non-optimal staging, i.e., patients with more risk of unappreciated residual disease.
机译:背景:所有早期卵巢癌辅助化疗的随机试验均缺乏统计能力,无法显示辅助化疗与无辅助化疗对生存率的影响。他们也没有考虑到手术分期的适当性。我们进行了一项前瞻性,无盲的,随机的,III期临床试验,以测试辅助化疗对早期卵巢癌患者的疗效,重点在于手术分期的范围。方法:从1990年11月至2000年1月,来自9个欧洲国家40个中心的448名患者在手术后被随机分配至辅助性铂类化学疗法(n = 224)或观察(n = 224)。终点是总生存期和无复发生存期,分析是基于意向性治疗。 Kaplan-Meier方法用于进行事件发生时间分析,对数秩检验用于比较治疗组之间的差异。统计检验是双面的。结果:中位随访5.5年后,两个试验组之间的总生存率差异无统计学意义(危险比[HR] = 0.69,95%置信区间[CI] = 0.44至1.08; P =。 10)。然而,辅助化疗组的无复发生存率在统计学上有显着改善(HR = 0.63,95%CI = 0.43至0.92; P = .02)。大约三分之一的患者(n = 151)已经过最佳分期,而三分之二(n = 297)没有达到最佳分期。在观察组患者中,最佳分期与总体生存率和无复发生存率具有统计学意义的显着改善(HR = 2.31 [95%CI = 1.08至4.96]; P = .03和HR = 1.82 [95%CI =分别为1.02至3.24] P = .04)。在化疗组中未观察到这种关联。在非最佳分期的患者中,辅助化疗与总体生存率和无复发生存率具有统计学意义的显着改善(HR = 1.75 [95%CI = 1.04至2.95]; P = .03和HR = 1.78 [95%CI = 1.15至2.77]; P分别为.009)。在最佳分期患者中,未观察到辅助化疗的益处。结论:辅助化疗与早期卵巢癌患者的无复发生存率统计学上显着相关。辅助化疗的益处似乎仅限于分期不理想的患者,即,未发现残留疾病风险更高的患者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号