首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the National Cancer Institute >National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement: adjuvant therapy for breast cancer, November 1-3, 2000.
【24h】

National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement: adjuvant therapy for breast cancer, November 1-3, 2000.

机译:美国国立卫生研究院共识发展会议声明:乳腺癌的辅助治疗,2000年11月1-3日。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to provide health-care providers, patients, and the general public with an assessment of currently available data regarding the use of adjuvant therapy for breast cancer. PARTICIPANTS: The participants included a non-Federal, non-advocate, 14-member panel representing the fields of oncology, radiology, surgery, pathology, statistics, public health, and health policy as well as patient representatives. In addition, 30 experts in medical oncology, radiation oncology, biostatistics, epidemiology, surgical oncology, and clinical trials presented data to the panel and to a conference audience of 1000. EVIDENCE: The literature was searched with the use of MEDLINE(TM) for January 1995 through July 2000, and an extensive bibliography of 2230 references was provided to the panel. Experts prepared abstracts for their conference presentations with relevant citations from the literature. Evidence from randomized clinical trials and evidence from prospective studies were given precedence over clinical anecdotal experience. Consensus Process: The panel, answering predefined questions, developed its conclusions based on the evidence presented in open forum and the scientific literature. The panel composed a draft statement, which was read in its entirety and circulated to the experts and the audience for comment. Thereafter, the panel resolved conflicting recommendations and released a revised statement at the end of the conference. The panel finalized the revisions within a few weeks after the conference. The draft statement was made available on the World Wide Web immediately after its release at the conference and was updated with the panel's final revisions. The statement is available at http://consensus.nih.gov. CONCLUSIONS: The panel concludes that decisions regarding adjuvant hormonal therapy should be based on the presence of hormone receptor protein in tumor tissues. Adjuvant hormonal therapy should be offered only to women whose tumors express hormone receptor protein. Because adjuvant polychemotherapy improves survival, it should be recommended to the majority of women with localized breast cancer regardless of lymph node, menopausal, or hormone receptor status. The inclusion of anthracyclines in adjuvant chemotherapy regimens produces a small but statistically significant improvement in survival over non-anthracycline-containing regimens. Available data are currently inconclusive regarding the use of taxanes in adjuvant treatment of lymph node-positive breast cancer. The use of adjuvant dose-intensive chemotherapy regimens in high-risk breast cancer and of taxanes in lymph node-negative breast cancer should be restricted to randomized trials. Ongoing studies evaluating these treatment strategies should be supported to determine if such strategies have a role in adjuvant treatment. Studies to date have included few patients older than 70 years. There is a critical need for trials to evaluate the role of adjuvant chemotherapy in these women. There is evidence that women with a high risk of locoregional tumor recurrence after mastectomy benefit from postoperative radiotherapy. This high-risk group includes women with four or more positive lymph nodes or an advanced primary cancer. Currently, the role of postmastectomy radiotherapy for patients with one to three positive lymph nodes remains uncertain and should be tested in a randomized controlled trial. Individual patients differ in the importance they place on the risks and benefits of adjuvant treatments. Quality of life needs to be evaluated in selected randomized clinical trials to examine the impact of the major acute and long-term side effects of adjuvant treatments, particularly premature menopause, weight gain, mild memory loss, and fatigue. Methods to support shared decision-making between patients and their physicians have been successful in trials; they need to be tailored for diverse populations and should be tested for broader dissemination.
机译:目的:我们的目标是为医疗保健提供者,患者和公众提供有关乳腺癌辅助治疗的当前可用数据的评估。参与者:参与者包括14名成员的非联邦,非拥护者,代表了肿瘤学,放射学,外科,病理学,统计学,公共卫生和健康政策领域以及患者代表。此外,医学肿瘤学,放射肿瘤学,生物统计学,流行病学,外科肿瘤学和临床试验方面的30位专家向专家组和1000位与会者提供了数据。证据:使用MEDLINE(TM)搜索了文献。 1995年1月至2000年7月,向专家组提供了2230篇参考书目。专家为会议演讲准备了摘要,并提供了相关文献资料。随机临床试验的证据和前瞻性研究的证据优先于临床轶事经验。共识过程:小组回答了预先定义的问题,并根据公开论坛和科学文献中提供的证据得出了结论。小组成员组成了一份声明草案,全文阅读并分发给专家和听众以征求意见。此后,小组解决了相互矛盾的建议,并在会议结束时发表了修订的声明。小组在会议之后的几周内完成了修订。声明草案在会议上发布后立即在万维网上提供,并随小组的最终修订而更新。该声明可从http://consensus.nih.gov获得。结论:专家组得出结论,有关辅助激素治疗的决定应基于肿瘤组织中激素受体蛋白的存在。仅对肿瘤表达激素受体蛋白的女性提供激素辅助治疗。由于辅助性多化学疗法可提高生存率,因此无论局部淋巴结,更年期或激素受体状态如何,均应推荐给大多数局部乳腺癌女性。与不含蒽环类药物的方案相比,辅助化疗方案中包含蒽环类药物的生存率提高了一个小但统计学上显着的改善。目前关于紫杉烷类药物在淋巴结阳性乳腺癌的辅助治疗中的使用尚无定论。高危乳腺癌中辅助剂量密集化疗方案的使用以及淋巴结阴性乳腺癌中紫杉烷类药物的使用应仅限于随机试验。应支持正在进行的评估这些治疗策略的研究,以确定这些策略是否在辅助治疗中起作用。迄今为止的研究仅包括几名70岁以上的患者。迫切需要评估这些女性中辅助化疗作用的试验。有证据表明,乳房切除术后局部区域肿瘤复发的高风险女性可从术后放疗中受益。此高危人群包括具有四个或更多阳性淋巴结或晚期原发癌的女性。目前,乳房切除术后放疗对一到三个阳性淋巴结患者的作用尚不确定,应在随机对照试验中进行测试。各个患者对辅助治疗的风险和益处的重视程度不同。需要在选定的随机临床试验中评估生活质量,以检查辅助治疗的主要急性和长期副作用的影响,尤其是更年期提前,体重增加,轻度记忆力减退和疲劳。在试验中,支持患者及其医师之间共同决策的方法已经成功。他们需要针对不同的人群进行量身定制,并应进行测试以进行更广泛的传播。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号