首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials >Indentation techniques for evaluating the fracture toughness of biomaterials and hard tissues.
【24h】

Indentation techniques for evaluating the fracture toughness of biomaterials and hard tissues.

机译:压痕技术,用于评估生物材料和硬组织的断裂韧性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Indentation techniques for assessing fracture toughness are attractive due to the simplicity and expediency of experiments, and because they potentially allow the characterization of both local and bulk fracture properties. Unfortunately, rarely have such techniques been proven to give accurate fracture toughness values. This is a concern, as such techniques are seeing increasing usage in the study of biomaterials and biological hard tissues. Four available indentation techniques are considered in the present article: the Vickers indentation fracture (VIF) test, the cube corner indentation fracture (CCIF) test, the Vickers crack opening displacement (VCOD) test and the interface indentation fracture (IIF) test. Each technique is discussed in terms of its suitability for assessing the absolute and relative toughness of materials or material interfaces based on the published literature on the topic. In general, the VIF and CCIF techniques are found to be poor for quantitatively evaluating toughness of any brittle material, and the large errors involved (approximately +/-50%) make their applicability as comparative techniques limited. Indeed, indentation toughness values must differ by at least by a factor of three to conclude a significant difference in actual toughness. Additionally, new experimental results are presented on using the CCIF test to evaluate the fracture resistance of human cortical bone. Those new results indicate that inducing cracking is difficult, and that the cracks that do form are embedded in the plastic zone of the indent, invalidating the use of linear elastic fracture mechanics based techniques for evaluating the toughness associated with those cracks. The VCOD test appears to be a good quantitative method for some glasses, but initial results suggest there may be problems associated with applying this technique to other brittle materials. Finally, the IIF technique should only be considered a comparative or semi-quantitative technique for comparing material interfaces and/or the neighboring materials.
机译:由于实验的简单性和便利性,用于评估断裂韧度的压痕技术具有吸引力,因为它们潜在地可以表征局部和整体断裂性能。不幸的是,很少有人证明这种技术能给出准确的断裂韧性值。这是一个令人关注的问题,因为这种技术在生物材料和生物硬组织的研究中正越来越多地使用。本文考虑了四种可用的压痕技术:维氏压痕断裂(VIF)测试,立方角压痕断裂(CCIF)测试,维氏裂纹张开位移(VCOD)测试和界面压痕断裂(IIF)测试。根据有关该主题的已发表文献,针对每种技术在评估材料或材料界面的绝对和相对韧性方面的适用性进行了讨论。通常,发现VIF和CCIF技术在定量评估任何脆性材料的韧性方面很差,并且涉及的大误差(大约+/- 50%)限制了它们作为比较技术的适用性。实际上,压痕韧性值必须相差至少三倍,才能得出实际韧性的显着差异。此外,使用CCIF测试评估人皮层骨的抗断裂性还提供了新的实验结果。这些新结果表明,难以产生裂纹,并且确实形成的裂纹被嵌入凹痕的塑性区中,从而使基于线性弹性断裂力学的技术无法评估与这些裂纹相关的韧性。 VCOD测试对于某些玻璃来说似乎是一种很好的定量方法,但初步结果表明,将该技术应用于其他易碎材料可能存在一些问题。最后,IIF技术仅应被视为用于比较材料界面和/或相邻材料的比较或半定量技术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号