...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of telemedicine and telecare >Remote ophthalmology services: cost comparison of telemedicine and alternative service delivery options.
【24h】

Remote ophthalmology services: cost comparison of telemedicine and alternative service delivery options.

机译:远程眼科服务:比较远程医疗和其他服务提供方式的成本。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

We calculated the cost of an established tele-ophthalmology service, from a health-provider's perspective, and compared this with the cost of three other existing eye-care service delivery options. During a 12-month study period, 118 persons took part in the tele-ophthalmology consultations between a rural clinic located approximately 900 km from the Lions Eye Institute in Perth. The variable costs of tele-ophthalmology were Dollars 166.89 (Australian dollars) per patient, and the alternatives cost Dollars 445.96, Dollars 271.48 and Dollars 665.44 per patient. Tele-ophthalmology incurred a set-up cost of Dollars 13,340. The threshold at which tele-ophthalmology became cheaper than any of the alternative options occurred at a workload of 128 patients. Tele-ophthalmology offers a viable alternative to conventional eye-care service in rural and remote areas.
机译:我们从医疗服务提供者的角度计算了已建立的远程眼科服务的成本,并将其与其他三个现有眼保健服务交付选项的成本进行了比较。在为期12个月的研究期内,有118人参加了距离珀斯狮子眼研究所约900公里的乡村诊所之间的远程眼科咨询。远眼科的可变成本为每位患者166.89美元(澳元),替代方案的成本为每位患者445.96美元,271.48美元和665.44美元。远程眼科的设置费用为13,340美元。在128名患者的工作量下,远眼科比任何其他选择便宜的门槛就出现了。远程眼科为农村和偏远地区的常规眼保健服务提供了可行的替代方案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号