首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior >EQUIVALENCE CLASS FORMATION IN A TRACE STIMULUS PAIRING TWO-RESPONSE FORMAT: EFFECTS OF RESPONSE LABELS AND PRIOR PROGRAMMED TRANSITIVITY INDUCTION
【24h】

EQUIVALENCE CLASS FORMATION IN A TRACE STIMULUS PAIRING TWO-RESPONSE FORMAT: EFFECTS OF RESPONSE LABELS AND PRIOR PROGRAMMED TRANSITIVITY INDUCTION

机译:轨迹刺激对的两种响应格式中的等价类形成:响应标签和预先编程的传递性诱导的效应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Three experiments identified factors that did and did not enhance the formation of two-node four-member equivalence classes when training and testing were conducted with trials presented in a trace Stimulus pairing two-response (SP2R) format.. All trials contained two separately presented stimuli. Half of the trials, called within-class trials, contained Stimuli front the same class while the other half, called cross class trials, contained stimuli from different classes. On within class trials, making a YES response was correct and making a NO response was wrong. On cross class trials, making a NO response was correct and making a YES response was wrong. In Experiment 1, similar intermediate percentages of participants (about 50%) formed classes, regardless of whether the responses were labeled YES and NO or SAME and DIFF. Response labeling thus did not influence class formation. Regardless of response labels, failures of class formation were primarily due to failure of class-indicative responding produced by within-class transitivity probes. In Experiment. 2, only 50% of participants formed classes without prior training, as in Experiment 1, but 100% of participants formed equivalence classes after the establishment of a generalized transitivity repertoire by use of a programmed transitivity induction protocol. Experiment 3 examined two components of the programmed transitivity induction protocol and found that the exclusion of AC trials had no effect on the percentage of participants who formed equivalence classes, while presenting the Stimulus sets in randomized order interfered with equivalence class formation. A further analysis found that a number of stimulus control topographies differentiated between individuals who did and did not form equivalence classes. In general, then, these experiments demonstrate that equivalence classes can be formed reliably when training and testing are conducted in an SP2R format., Supporting the view that equivalence class formation can account for the development of conceptual categories in natural settings.
机译:当采用痕量刺激配对两响应(SP2R)形式进行的试验进行训练和测试时,三个实验确定了哪些因素可以促进和不增强两节点四成员等效类的形成。所有试验均包含两个单独提出的试验刺激。一半的试验(称为班内试验)包含的刺激物位于同一个班级的前面,而另一半的试验(称为跨班试验)则包含来自不同班级的刺激物。在班级内部试验中,做出“是”答复是正确的,而做出“否”答复是错误的。在跨类试验中,做出“否”响应是正确的,做出“是”响应是错误的。在实验1中,无论响应是否标记为“是”和“否”或“相同和不同”,参与者的中间百分比相似(大约50%)形成了类别。因此,响应标签不会影响班级的形成。不管响应标签如何,类形成失败均归因于类内传递探针产生的类指示响应失败。在实验中。如图2所示,只有50%的参与者在没有事先培训的情况下形成了班级,如实验1所示,但是100%的参与者在通过使用编程的和声归纳协议建立了广义的和物表之后,就形成了对等类。实验3检查了编程的传递性诱导方案的两个组成部分,发现排除AC试验对形成等价类的参与者的百分比没有影响,同时以随机顺序显示刺激集会干扰等价类的形成。进一步的分析发现,许多刺激控制地形在区分是否形成等价类的个体之间有所区别。通常,然后,这些实验证明,当以SP2R格式进行训练和测试时,可以可靠地形成等效类。支持这样的观点,即等效类的形成可以说明自然环境中概念类别的发展。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号