...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical neuropharmacology >A comparison of cinnarizine and transdermal scopolamine for the prevention of seasickness in naval crew: A double-blind, randomized, crossover study
【24h】

A comparison of cinnarizine and transdermal scopolamine for the prevention of seasickness in naval crew: A double-blind, randomized, crossover study

机译:肉桂利嗪和经皮东sco碱预防海军船员晕船的比较:一项双盲,随机,交叉研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study was to compare the efficacy of transdermal scopolamine and cinnarizine in the prevention of seasickness and their adverse reactions. METHODS: Seventy-six naval crew members participated in a double-blind, randomized, crossover study. On 2 voyages, they were administered either a transdermal scopolamine patch containing 1.5 mg scopolamine and placebo tablets or 25-mg cinnarizine tablets and a placebo patch. Subjects completed questionnaires for each voyage, reporting on the efficacy of the drugs, the severity of their adverse reactions, and the preferred treatment. RESULTS: Subjects reported the scopolamine patch to be significantly more effective than the cinnarizine tablet (P = 0.029). A moderate to high degree of drowsiness was attributed more frequently to cinnarizine than to the scopolamine patch (34% and 17%, respectively; P < 0.02). Any adverse reaction, to at least a moderate degree, was more frequent with cinnarizine (38%) than with the scopolamine patch (22%), although the significance of this association was borderline. A significantly greater percentage of subjects preferred transdermal scopolamine to cinnarizine (41 vs 12%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Higher efficacy, a lower rate of adverse reactions, and convenience all led the participants of this study to prefer the scopolamine patch to cinnarizine. Considering the 2 therapeutic options assessed in this study, and in light of the findings of previous studies, it is recommended that the scopolamine patch be used as the drug of choice for the treatment of seasickness among naval crew in particular and probably also among all other sea travelers.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是比较经皮东sco碱和肉桂碱在预防晕船及其不良反应中的功效。方法:76名海军船员参加了一项双盲,随机,交叉研究。在2次航程中,向他们服用含有1.5 mg东pol碱和安慰剂片剂的东碱透皮贴剂或25 mg肉桂利嗪片和安慰剂贴剂。受试者完成了每次航行的问卷调查,报告了药物的功效,不良反应的严重程度以及首选的治疗方法。结果:受试者报告东pol碱贴剂比辛那利嗪片有效得多(P = 0.029)。中度至高度的困倦归因于辛那利嗪而不是东pol碱贴片(分别为34%和17%; P <0.02)。辛那利嗪(38%)比东pol碱贴剂(22%)的任何不良反应(至少为中度)更为频繁,尽管这种关联的意义是临界的。较大比例的受试者更喜欢经皮东pol碱而不是肉桂那嗪(41%vs 12%,P <0.001)。结论:较高的疗效,较低的不良反应率和便利性均使该研究的参与者更喜欢东pol碱贴剂而不是肉桂那嗪。考虑到本研究评估的2种治疗选择,并根据以前的研究结果,建议将东pol碱贴片用作治疗海军人员晕船的首选药物,尤其是所有其他海军人员海上旅行者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号