首页> 外文期刊>Clinical neuropharmacology >Trimipramine fails to exert antimanic efficacy: a case of the discrepancy between in vitro rationale and clinical efficacy.
【24h】

Trimipramine fails to exert antimanic efficacy: a case of the discrepancy between in vitro rationale and clinical efficacy.

机译:曲米帕明不能发挥抗躁狂药的功效:这是体外原理与临床功效之间存在差异的情况。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Standard mood stabilizers, such as lithium and haloperidol, and anticonvulsants show effectiveness in a maximum of 60%-70% of acutely manic patients. Obviously, there is a clinical need to evaluate other treatment options. Current pathophysiologic concepts suggest that substances with an ameliorating effect on dopaminergic hyperfunction, serotonergic hypofunction, or GABAergic hypofunction might be useful, as may be substances with calcium-antagonistic effects. In vitro, the antidepressant trimipramine exerts dopamine- and calcium-antagonistic properties. Therefore, we conducted an open trial to screen it for antimanic action. We found no clinical benefit in four acutely manic patients receiving up to 400 mg/d of trimipramine. It is concluded that, at least in the case of trimipramine, the pharmacologic profile is not helpful in predicting potential effectiveness in mania.
机译:标准的情绪稳定剂(例如锂和氟哌啶醇)和抗惊厥药在最多60%-70%的急性躁狂患者中显示出疗效。显然,临床上需要评估其他治疗方案。当前的病理生理学概念表明,对多巴胺能功能亢进,血清素能低下或GABA能低下有改善作用的物质可能是有用的,而对钙具有拮抗作用的物质也可能有用。在体外,抗抑郁药三甲胺具有多巴胺和钙的拮抗作用。因此,我们进行了公开试验,以筛选其抗躁狂行为。我们发现四名接受最高剂量为400 mg / d的三苯丙胺的急性躁狂患者没有临床益处。结论是,至少在曲美拉明的情况下,药理学特征无助于预测躁狂症的潜在疗效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号