...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology: JEADV >Psoralen and ultraviolet A and narrow-band ultraviolet B in inducing stability in vitiligo, assessed by vitiligo disease activity score: an open prospective comparative study.
【24h】

Psoralen and ultraviolet A and narrow-band ultraviolet B in inducing stability in vitiligo, assessed by vitiligo disease activity score: an open prospective comparative study.

机译:补骨脂素和紫外线A和窄带紫外线B在白癜风中诱导稳定性的评估,通过白癜风疾病活动评分进行评估:一项开放的前瞻性比较研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background Vitiligo is a common pigmentary disorder with great cosmetic and psychological morbidity and an unpredictable course. No treatment available is a definitive cure. Systemic psoralen and ultraviolet A (PUVA) has been the mainstay of treatment. Narrow-band UVB (NBUVB) was later introduced. In this study, we have compared the phototherapy modalities PUVA and NBUVB in inducing stability in vitiligo, assessed by using vitiligo disease activity score (VIDA), for the first time. Aims To investigate the position of NBUVB vis-a-vis PUVA in terms of stability achieved during therapy as indicated by the VIDA scores. Subjects and methods It was an open, prospective study of 50 patients divided equally in PUVA and NBUVB groups. The study period was from January 2004 to June 2005. This study was done as a part of a larger project to compare the efficacy of mentioned modalities in degree of repigmentation. Results In the NBUVB group, disease activity was present in 40% patients before commencement of therapy, which was reduced to 16% at the end of therapy (statistically significant, P = 0.049). In the PUVA group, similar figures were 20% and 16%, respectively. In the NBUVB group, 50% of patients whose disease was active prior to commencement of therapy had less than 50% repigmentation, whereas an equal number of patients had repigmentation of more than 50%. Almost an equal number of stable patients had less than and more than 50% repigmentation. In the PUVA group, 4 of the 5 (80%) patients who had active disease had less than 50% repigmentation, whereas only 1 patient (20%) with active disease obtained more than 50% repigmentation. The time to attain stability was 3.6 +/- 2.1 months in the NBUVB group and 3.22 +/- 3.1 months in the PUVA group. Eight of the 10 (80%) patients with unstable disease in the NBUVB group achieved stability, whereas 2 of the 5 (40%) patients of similar pre-treatment status in the PUVA group achieved stability. Conclusion NBUVB was in a more statistically advantageous position vis-a-vis PUVA, in respect to stability achieved and efficacy in both active and stable disease in a comparable time period.
机译:背景白癜风是一种常见的色素性疾病,其美容和心理发病率很高,病程难以预测。没有可用的治疗方法是绝对的治疗方法。全身性补骨脂素和紫外线A(PUVA)一直是治疗的主要手段。后来引入了窄带UVB(NBUVB)。在这项研究中,我们首次比较了使用白癜风疾病活动评分(VIDA)评估的光疗方式PUVA和NBUVB诱导白癜风的稳定性。目的根据VIDA评分显示,在治疗过程中达到的稳定性方面,研究NBUVB相对于PUVA的位置。受试者和方法这是一项开放性,前瞻性研究,研究对象为50名患者,均分为PUVA和NBUVB组。研究期为2004年1月至2005年6月。该研究是一个较大项目的一部分,目的是比较上述方式在色素沉着程度中的功效。结果在NBUVB组中,开始治疗前40%的患者存在疾病活动性,在治疗结束时降至16%(统计学意义,P = 0.049)。在PUVA组中,相似的数字分别为20%和16%。在NBUVB组中,开始治疗之前疾病活跃的患者中有50%的色素沉着不足50%,而同样数量的患者色素沉着超过50%。几乎相等数量的稳定患者的色素沉着率低于和超过50%。在PUVA组中,患有活动性疾病的5名患者中有4名(80%)的色素沉着低于50%,而患有活动性疾病的患者中只有1名(20%)的色素沉着超过50%。 NBUVB组达到稳定的时间为3.6 +/- 2.1个月,PUVA组达到3.22 +/- 3.1个月。 NBUVB组的10名不稳定疾病患者中有8名(80%)达到稳定,而PUVA组的5名(40%)具有类似治疗前状态的患者中有2名达到了稳定性。结论就可比较的时间段内在活动性和稳定性疾病中获得的稳定性和疗效而言,NBUVB相对于PUVA处于统计学上更有利的位置。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号