首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the history of the neurosciences >Morgagni on apoplexy in De Sedibus: a historical perspective.
【24h】

Morgagni on apoplexy in De Sedibus: a historical perspective.

机译:莫尔加尼(Morgagni)对中风的看法:历史的视角。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper considers the historical significance of case reports on apoplexy and paralysis in Morgagni's De Sedibus et Causis Morborum. When autopsies became relatively common in the sixteenth century, Galen's speculation that apoplexy was caused by the accumulation of cold phlegm or black bile in the cerebral ventricles began to be questioned and was largely abandoned in the following century. The notion that the seats and causes of diseases are to be found in solid organs and not in the dyscrasia of humors gradually replaced many but not all humoral concepts. Morgagni's letters on apoplexy bolstered this "solidist" idea, but humoral physiology was still employed as a foundation for the treatment of apoplexy and to explain some aspects of the pathogenesis of this syndrome. Based on autopsy studies, Morgagni considered two principal forms of apoplexy, due to intracranial hemorrhage ("sanguineous apoplexy") and excessive intracranial fluid ("serous apoplexy"), to which he added a group that he judged to be separate from these two archetypes.
机译:本文考虑了Morgagni的《 De Sedibus et Causis Morborum》中风和瘫痪病例报告的历史意义。当尸体解剖在16世纪变得相对普遍时,盖伦(Galen)关于中风是由脑室中冷痰或黑胆汁积聚引起的推测开始受到质疑,并在随后的世纪中被广泛抛弃。疾病的部位和原因应在实体器官而不是幽默障碍中找到的观念逐渐取代了许多但不是全部的幽默概念。莫尔加尼(Morgagni)关于中风的信件支持了这种“固执主义者”的思想,但体液生理学仍被用作治疗中风并解释该综合征发病机理的某些方面。根据尸检研究,Morgagni考虑了两种主要形式的中风,这是由于颅内出血(“血性中风”)和颅内积液过多(“浆液性中风”)引起的,他添加了一组他认为与这两种原型不同的疾病。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号