...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association. >Comparison of two bioassay techniques for assessing the acute toxicity of pesticides to chironomid larvae (Diptera: Chironomidae).
【24h】

Comparison of two bioassay techniques for assessing the acute toxicity of pesticides to chironomid larvae (Diptera: Chironomidae).

机译:两种生物测定技术的比较,以评估农药对棘皮动物幼虫(Diptera:Chironomidae)的急性毒性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Two container and substrate combinations were compared to determine which provided optimal survival of larvae of Chironomus tepperi and Glyptotendipes paripes in the absence of toxicants. Unfed final-stage larvae of G. paripes survived significantly (P < 0.05) better in waxed paper cups with sand substrate (92.8% after 3 days) than in glass tubes with a shredded paper substrate (85.3%). Survival of larvae of C. tepperi over the same period did not differ significantly in the 2 systems. Larvae of C. tepperi were bioassayed against 3 insecticides (technical and formulated imidacloprid, chlorpyrifos, and betacypermethrin) with both container and substrate combinations. Median lethal concentration values (24 h) obtained with waxed cups with sand were 1.8 times higher on average than those obtained with glass tubes with shredded paper (range 1.13-2.65 times). To determine the cause of this variability, solid-phase microextraction was used to measure changes in chlorpyrifos availability over time in the 2 bioassay systems. Chlorpyrifos concentrations in the waxed cups and sand system fell from 7.50 to 3.36 microg/liter over 24 h, probably as a consequence of chemical adsorption to the waxed surfaces. Chlorpyrifos concentrations in the glass tubes and paper system remained unchanged over this period. Excluding substrates from the containers had only a minor effect on chlorpyrifos availability. These results demonstrate that the behaviors of both test organisms and toxicants within bioassay systems need to be understood if the data generated with different systems are to be compared. Understanding how toxicant availability is affected by different container and substrate types is particularly important where bioassays are conducted with nominal concentration values rather than analytically determined exposure concentrations.
机译:比较了两种容器和底物的组合,以确定在没有毒物的情况下,它们能使Chironomus tepperi和Glyptotendipes paripe的幼虫获得最佳存活。带有砂底物的蜡纸杯(3天后占92.8%)比带有切碎纸底物的玻璃管(85.3%)中未饲喂的G. paripes幼虫的存活期明显更好(P <0.05)。在两个系统中,C。tepperi幼虫在同一时期的存活率没有显着差异。用容器和底物组合对3种杀虫剂(工业上和配方上的吡虫啉,毒死rif和倍氯氰菊酯)进行生物分析。用打蜡的杯子加砂子测得的中位致死浓度值(24小时)平均比用碎纸的玻璃管测得的中值致死浓度值高(1.13至2.65倍)。为了确定这种可变性的原因,在2种生物测定系统中,固相微萃取用于测量毒死rif的利用率随时间的变化。在打蜡的杯子和沙子系统中,毒死rif的浓度在24小时内从7.50微克/升下降到3.36微克/升,这可能是化学吸附到打蜡表面的结果。在此期间,玻璃管和纸系统中毒死rif的浓度保持不变。从容器中排除底物对毒死rif的利用率只有很小的影响。这些结果表明,如果要比较使用不同系统生成的数据,则需要了解生物测定系统内测试生物和毒物的行为。当以标称浓度值而不是分析确定的暴露浓度进行生物测定时,了解不同容器和底物类型如何影响有毒物质的可用性尤为重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号