...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : >Handheld vs. laptop computers for electronic data collection in clinical research: a crossover randomized trial.
【24h】

Handheld vs. laptop computers for electronic data collection in clinical research: a crossover randomized trial.

机译:用于临床研究中电子数据收集的手持式与便携式计算机:一项交叉随机试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To compare users' speed, number of entry errors and satisfaction in using two current devices for electronic data collection in clinical research: handheld and laptop computers. DESIGN: The authors performed a randomized cross-over trial using 160 different paper-based questionnaires and representing altogether 45,440 variables. Four data coders were instructed to record, according to a random predefined and equally balanced sequence, the content of these questionnaires either on a laptop or on a handheld computer. Instructions on the kind of device to be used were provided to data-coders in individual sealed and opaque envelopes. Study conditions were controlled and the data entry process performed in a quiet environment. MEASUREMENTS: The authors compared the duration of the data recording process, the number of errors and users' satisfaction with the two devices. The authors divided errors into two separate categories, typing and missing data errors. The original paper-based questionnaire was used as a gold-standard. RESULTS: The overall duration of the recording process was significantly reduced (2.0 versus 3.3 min) when data were recorded on the laptop computer (p < 0.001). Data accuracy also improved. There were 5.8 typing errors per 1,000 entries with the laptop compared to 8.4 per 1,000 with the handheld computer (p < 0.001). The difference was even more important for missing data which decreased from 22.8 to 2.9 per 1,000 entries when a laptop was used (p < 0.001). Users found the laptop easier, faster and more satisfying to use than the handheld computer. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the increasing use of handheld computers for electronic data collection in clinical research, these devices should be used with caution. They double the duration of the data entry process and significantly increase the risk of typing errors and missing data. This may become a particularly crucial issue in studies where these devices are provided to patients or healthcare workers, unfamiliar with computer technologies, for self-reporting or research data collection processes.
机译:目的:比较在临床研究中使用两种当前设备进行电子数据收集的用户的速度,输入错误的数量和满意度。设计:作者使用160种不同的纸质问卷进行了一项随机交叉试验,该问卷总共代表了45,440个变量。指示四名数据编码员按照预定的随机且均等的顺序在便携式计算机或手持计算机上记录这些调查表的内容。数据编码器以单独密封和不透明的信封形式提供了有关要使用的设备类型的说明。控制研究条件,并在安静的环境中执行数据输入过程。测量:作者比较了数据记录过程的持续时间,错误数量和用户对这两种设备的满意度。作者将错误分为两类,分别是键入错误和丢失数据错误。原始的纸质问卷被用作黄金标准。结果:当在便携式计算机上记录数据时,记录过程的总持续时间显着减少(2.0对3.3分钟)(p <0.001)。数据准确性也有所提高。笔记本电脑每千个条目有5.8个键入错误,而手持电脑每千个条目有8.4个输入错误(p <0.001)。对于丢失的数据而言,差异更为重要,使用笔记本电脑时,丢失的数据从每1,000个条目的22.8个减少到2.9个(p <0.001)。用户发现笔记本电脑比手持电脑更容易,更快,更令人满意。结论:尽管在临床研究中越来越多地使用手持计算机进行电子数据收集,但应谨慎使用这些设备。它们使数据输入过程的持续时间加倍,并显着增加了键入错误和数据丢失的风险。在将这些设备提供给不熟悉计算机技术的患者或医护人员进行自我报告或研究数据收集过程的研究中,这可能成为特别关键的问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号