首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American Medical Directors Association >A feasibility study of transcutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation for bladder and bowel dysfunction in elderly adults in residential care.
【24h】

A feasibility study of transcutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation for bladder and bowel dysfunction in elderly adults in residential care.

机译:住所护理中老年人经皮胫后神经刺激对膀胱和肠功能障碍的可行性研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

To assess preliminary effects of a program of transcutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation (TPTNS) on lower urinary tract symptoms and number of episodes of urinary and fecal incontinence in older adults in residential care homes and the feasibility of a full-scale randomized trial.Pilot randomized single-blind, placebo-controlled trial.Seven residential care homes and 3 sheltered accommodation complexes in the United Kingdom.Thirty care home residents aged 65 and older with urinary or bowel symptoms and/or incontinence.Twelve 30-minute sessions of TPTNS or sham stimulation (placebo).Lower urinary tract symptoms using American Urological Society Symptom Index, urinary incontinence using International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form (ICIQ-SF), postvoid residual urine volumes using portable bladder scanning, bowel symptoms and fecal incontinence using selected ICIQ questions.Total American Urological Society Symptom Index scores improved, showing a median reduction of 7 (interquartile range [IQR] -8 to -3) in the TPTNS group and a median increase in the sham stimulation (placebo) group of 1 (IQR -1 to 4) (Mann-Whitney U 16.5000, Z -3.742, P < .001). Total ICIQ-SF scores improved by a median of 2 (IQR -6 to 0) in the TPTNS group and 0 points (IQR -3 to 3) in the sham stimulation group (Mann-Whitney U 65.000, Z -1.508, P = .132). Significant reduction was found in postvoid residual urine of 55 mL in the TPTNS group (t = -2.215, df 11.338, P = .048). Bowel urgency improved in 27% of the TPTNS group compared with 8% of the sham group (χ(2) 2.395, df 2, P > .302), fecal leakage improved in 47% of the TPTNS group compared with 23% of the sham group (χ(2) 4.480, df 2, P > .106); however, these differences were not significant. No adverse effects were reported by older adults or care staff.TPTNS is safe and acceptable with evidence of potential benefit for bladder and bowel dysfunction in older male and female residents of care homes. Data support the feasibility of a substantive trial of TPTNS in this population.
机译:评估经皮胫后神经刺激(TPTNS)程序对养老院老年人下尿路症状和尿失禁和粪便失禁发作次数的初步影响以及全面随机试验的可行性。单盲,安慰剂对照试验;英国的七个养老院和三个庇护所综合体;三十个65岁及65岁以上有尿或肠症状和/或失禁的养老院;十二次TPNNS或假手术30分钟使用美国泌尿外科学会症状指数降低尿路症状,使用失禁问卷-短小国际咨询法(ICIQ-SF)进行尿失禁,使用便携式膀胱扫描检查排尿后的残余尿量,使用选定的ICIQ进行肠蠕动和大便失禁美国泌尿外科学会总症状指数评分提高,显示中位数降低TPNNS组为7(四分位数范围[IQR] -8至-3),假刺激(安慰剂)组的中位数增加为1(IQR -1至4)(Mann-Whitney U 16.5000,Z -3.742 ,P <.001)。 TPNNS组的ICIQ-SF总得分提高了中位数2(IQR -6至0),而假刺激组(Mann-Whitney U 65.000,Z -1.508,P =)提高了0分(IQR -3至3)。 .132)。 TPNNS组的术后无尿残留尿量为55 mL,显着降低(t = -2.215,df 11.338,P = .048)。 TPNNS组的肠尿紧迫感改善了27%,而假手术组则提高了8%(χ(2)2.395,df 2,P> .302),TPNTS组的粪便渗漏改善了47%,而TPNNS组为23%假手术组(χ(2)4.480,df 2,P> .106);但是,这些差异并不明显。老年人或护理人员未报告不良反应。TPTNS是安全且可接受的,有证据表明,老年人和护理院的男性和女性居民对膀胱和肠功能障碍有潜在益处。数据支持在该人群中进行TPNNS实质性试验的可行性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号