首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American Geriatrics Society >Development and validation of a composite score as an easy-to-use instrument for clinical monitoring of dementia progression: the composite cognitive and activities of daily living functioning score.
【24h】

Development and validation of a composite score as an easy-to-use instrument for clinical monitoring of dementia progression: the composite cognitive and activities of daily living functioning score.

机译:综合评分的开发和验证,它是一种易于使用的工具,用于痴呆症进展的临床监测:日常生活功能评分的综合认知和活动。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

To the Editor: Several outcome measures can be used to describe and monitor the progression of disease severity in cognitive disorders, and several instruments are available. Research questions and available data often determine the choice of such instruments. There are specific instruments to measure cognition (global scales such as Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) or more-extensive neuropsy-chological assessment batteries), functional abilities (e.g., Katz activities of daily living (ADL) ), behavior (e.g., Neuropsychiatric Inventory ), and quality of life (e.g., Quality of Life in Alzheimer's Disease ), but each instrument measures just one aspect, whereas all of them are relevant to a person with cognitive impairment. Therefore, instruments combining all of these aspects, such as the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) scale and the Global Deterioration Scale (GDS), are usually based on clinical judgment. In spite of the validity of these composite measures, the need for clinical expertise to judge each subject can limit their use in the setting of large population-based studies because of time and financial constraints. In addition, some instruments have only a limited scale range (e.g., the GDS has 7 stages), which makes them less suitable for tracking small changes over time. Therefore, in the Kungsholmen Project (KP) -a longitudinal, population-based study on aging and dementia that followed 1,810 persons aged 75 and older for up to 12 years-an alternative composite score combining the MMSE and Katz ADL scores was developed and validated against the CDR scale.
机译:致编辑:可以使用几种结果指标来描述和监测认知障碍中疾病严重程度的进展,并且可以使用几种工具。研究问题和可用数据通常决定了此类工具的选择。有专门的工具来衡量认知度(全球尺度,例如小精神状态检查(MMSE)或更广泛的神经活检-心理评估电池),功能能力(例如,日常生活中的Katz活动(ADL)),行为(例如,神经精神病学调查表)和生活质量(例如,阿尔茨海默氏病的生活质量),但每种手段仅测量一个方面,而所有这些手段都与认知障碍患者有关。因此,结合所有这些方面的工具,例如临床痴呆评定量表(CDR)和全球恶化量表(GDS),通常都是基于临床判断。尽管这些综合措施是有效的,但由于时间和财力的限制,需要临床专业知识来判断每个受试者会限制其在大型人群研究中的使用。另外,某些仪器的比例范围有限(例如,GDS有7个阶段),这使得它们不太适合跟踪随时间变化的微小变化。因此,在Kungsholmen项目(KP)中,一项针对年龄和痴呆症的纵向,基于人群的研究,追踪了1,810名75岁及以上的人长达12年的经历,并开发并验证了结合MMSE和Katz ADL评分的替代综合评分相对于CDR规模。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号