...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American Geriatrics Society >Prospective multicenter study of acute asthma in younger versus older adults presenting to the emergency department.
【24h】

Prospective multicenter study of acute asthma in younger versus older adults presenting to the emergency department.

机译:急诊科对年轻人和老年人的急性哮喘进行的前瞻性多中心研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

OBJECTIVES: To describe acute asthma in younger versus older adults presenting to the emergency department (ED). DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. Asthmatic adults were divided into three age groups: 18 to 34, 35 to 54, and 55 and older. The analysis was restricted to never smokers and smokers with fewer than 10 pack-years. SETTING: ED. PARTICIPANTS: Two thousand sixty-four patients aged 18 and older with a physician diagnosis of asthma. MEASUREMENTS: Medications and peak expiratory flow. RESULTS: There were 1,158 (56%) subjects aged 18 to 34; 777 (37%) aged 35 to 54; and 129 (6%) aged 55 and older. Older patients were most likely to have a primary care provider (65%, 74%, and 91%, respectively; P<.001); most were not taking inhaled corticosteroids (39%, 55%, and 48%, respectively; P<.001). Older patients reported fewer ED visits for asthma (2, 2, and 1, respectively; P=.001) but were more likely to report asthma hospitalization (24%, 31%, and 37%, respectively; P<.001). All groups had severe exacerbations (initial percentage predicted peak flow: 47, 47, and 47, respectively; P=.50), but older patients were least likely to report severe symptoms (72%, 79%, and 67%, respectively; P=.001). Older patients did not respond as well to bronchodilators, even after controlling for other demographic factors, markers of asthma severity, and ED management (change between initial and final peak expiratory flow, using subjects aged 18 to 34 as reference: aged 35-54, beta=-0.7 (95% CI=-9.4-8.0); aged > or = 55, beta=-18.4 (-31.9 to -4.9)). The smaller change in peak expiratory flow contributed most to older patients' greater likelihood of hospitalization. CONCLUSION: Older asthma patients were less responsive to emergency bronchodilation. This may reflect chronic undertreatment with inhaled corticosteroids.
机译:目的:描述急诊科(ED)中年轻成年人和老年人的急性哮喘。设计:前瞻性队列研究。哮喘成年人分为三个年龄段:18至34岁,35至54岁,55岁及以上。该分析仅限于从不吸烟者和少于10个包装年的吸烟者。设置:ED。参与者:164名18岁及以上的患者经医生诊断为哮喘。测量:药物和呼气峰流量。结果:年龄在18至34岁之间的受试者为1158名(56%); 777(37%)年龄在35至54岁之间; 55岁以上的人中有129人(6%)。老年患者最有可能接受初级保健提供者(分别为65%,74%和91%; P <.001);大多数未服用吸入性糖皮质激素(分别为39%,55%和48%; P <.001)。老年患者报告因哮喘而进行急诊就诊的次数较少(分别为2、2和1; P = .001),但更有可能报告哮喘住院(分别为24%,31%和37%; P <.001)。所有组的病情都有严重加重(最初的峰值血流百分比分别为:47、47和47; P = .50),但是年龄较大的患者最不可能出现严重症状(分别为72%,79%和67%)。 P = .001)。即使控制了其他人口统计学因素,哮喘严重程度指标和ED处理(最初和最终呼气峰流量之间的变化,以18至34岁的受试者为参考),年龄较大的患者对支气管扩张药的反应也不太好。 beta = -0.7(95%CI = -9.4-8.0);年龄>或= 55,beta = -18.4(-31.9至-4.9))。呼气峰值流量的较小变化最大地帮助了老年患者住院的可能性更大。结论:老年哮喘患者对紧急支气管扩张反应较差。这可能反映了长期吸入皮质类固醇激素治疗不足。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号