首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American Society of Nephrology: JASN >Body composition in renal transplant patients: bioimpedance analysis compared to isotope dilution, dual energy X-ray absorptiometry, and anthropometry.
【24h】

Body composition in renal transplant patients: bioimpedance analysis compared to isotope dilution, dual energy X-ray absorptiometry, and anthropometry.

机译:肾移植患者的身体成分:与同位素稀释,双能X射线吸收法和人体测量法相比的生物阻抗分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Whether multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis (MF-BIA), a relatively new method for measuring body composition, is also applicable for accurate body composition measurements in renal transplant (RTx) patients is not known. Therefore, the use of MF-BIA is validated in 77 RTx patients with a stable renal function at least 2 yr posttransplantation. MF-BIA is compared to isotope dilution techniques for measurement of body water compartments, and to dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) and anthropometry for measurement of fat and fat free mass. Finally, DEXA and anthropometry are compared to each other. Method agreement is assessed by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and plotted by Bland and Altman analysis. MF-BIA significantly underestimates total body water (TBW, 0.7+/-2.1 L) and overestimates the extracellular water (ECW, 3.3+/-1.8 L) compared to isotope dilution; the ICC between both techniques is 0.943 for TBW and 0.846 for ECW. The percentage body fat (BF) measured by MF-BIA is significantly higher than both BF measured by DEXA (3.4+/-4.7%) or by anthropometry (5.5+/-5.2%). The ICC between MF-BIA and DEXA is 0.887 and between MF-BIA and anthropometry 0.856. BF measured by DEXA is significantly higher than BF measured by anthropometry (2.1+/-4.4%); their ICC is 0.913. In conclusion, MF-BIA seems to be suitable for measurement of TBW in RTx patients; however, method agreement between isotope dilution and MF-BIA for the measurement of ECW is not satisfactory. In the assessment of fat and fat free mass, the reliability of MF-BIA appears to be questionable. Method agreement between DEXA and anthropometry seems to be slightly better.
机译:目前尚不清楚多频生物电阻抗分析(MF-BIA)是一种相对较新的测量身体成分的方法,是否也可用于肾移植(RTx)患者的准确身体成分测量。因此,MF-BIA的使用已在77位RTx患者中得到证实,这些患者在移植后至少2年内肾功能稳定。 MF-BIA与同位素稀释技术用于人体水隔室的测量,并与双能X射线吸收法(DEXA)和人体测量法用于脂肪和无脂肪物质的测量。最后,将DEXA和人体测量学相互比较。方法一致性通过组内相关系数(ICC)进行评估,并通过Bland和Altman分析进行绘制。与同位素稀释相比,MF-BIA大大低估了人体总水(TBW,0.7 +/- 2.1 L),并高估了细胞外水(ECW,3.3 +/- 1.8 L);两种技术之间的ICC对于TBW为0.943,对于ECW为0.846。 MF-BIA测得的身体脂肪百分比(BF)显着高于DEXA测得的身体脂肪百分比(3.4 +/- 4.7%)或人体测量学测得的BF(5.5 +/- 5.2%)。 MF-BIA和DEXA之间的ICC为0.887,MF-BIA和人体测量学之间的ICC为0.856。通过DEXA测量的BF显着高于通过人体测量法测量的BF(2.1 +/- 4.4%);他们的ICC为0.913。总之,MF-BIA似乎适用于RTx患者的TBW测量。但是,同位素稀释和MF-BIA之间的ECW测量方法并不令人满意。在评估脂肪和无脂肪物质时,MF-BIA的可靠性似乎值得怀疑。 DEXA和人体测量学之间的方法一致性似乎要好一些。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号