首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American Society of Hypertension : >Effect of overcuffing on the accuracy of oscillometric blood pressure measurements
【24h】

Effect of overcuffing on the accuracy of oscillometric blood pressure measurements

机译:过度佩戴对示波法血压测量准确性的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Overcuffing (using too large a blood pressure [BP] cuff), is known to artificially lower auscultatory BP measurements; however, its effect on oscillometric readings is unclear. The possibility that overcuffing biases oscillometric readings is currently widely disregarded. We sought to confirm that overcuffing lowers auscultatory readings and to assess its effect on oscillometric measurements. Community-dwelling adults (aged >= 18 years) with arm circumferences within the standard range of 25-32 cm were recruited. Using primarily the International Standards Organization 2009 protocol, we compared the standard Baum adult (25-35 cm) to the large adult (33-47 cm) cuff. The standard cuff was considered the "reference standard." In Phase I, auscultatory measurements were performed by two trained observers. In Phase II, oscillometric measurements were performed. Each phase was analyzed independently using paired t-tests and by generating Bland-Altman plots. Of 108 participants, 87 contributed data for Phase I, 85 for Phase II, and 69 were common to both phases. Phase I mean age was 38.0 +/- 18.5 years, mean arm circumference was 28.0 +/- 1.9 cm, and 21% had a past hypertension. The Phase I results confirmed that overcuffing reduced auscultatory BP measurements by 3.6 +/- 5.1/2.8 +/- 4.0 mm Hg (P-values < .0001 for both). For Phase II, mean age was 39.3 +/- 18.3 years, mean arm circumference was 28.0 +/- 1.9 cm, and 22% had past hypertension. Mean BPs were 112.2 +/- 13.1/67.8 +/- 7.3 mm Hg for the large cuff and 117.8 +/- 13.3/71.2 +/- 7.1 mm Hg for the standard cuff (5.5 +/- 5.9/3.4 +/- 5.2 mm Hg lower with the large cuff; P-values < .0001).Overcuffing leads to a clinically important downward bias in oscillometric measurements. An upper size limits for oscillometric cuffs should be specified. (C) 2015 American Society of Hypertension. All rights reserved.
机译:过度佩戴(使用过大的血压[BP]袖带)已知会人工降低听诊BP的测量值;但是,它对示波法读数的影响尚不清楚。戴上手铐会使示波表读数产生偏差的可能性目前被广泛忽视。我们试图确认过度佩戴会降低听诊读数,并评估其对示波法测量的影响。招募了臂围在25-32厘米标准范围内的社区居民成年人(年龄大于等于18岁)。我们主要使用国际标准组织2009年的协议,将标准的Baum成人(25-35 cm)与大型成人(33-47 cm)袖带进行了比较。标准袖带被认为是“参考标准”。在第一阶段,由两名训练有素的观察员进行听诊测量。在第二阶段,进行示波测量。使用配对t检验并通过生成Bland-Altman图独立地分析每个阶段。在108名参与者中,第一阶段的贡献数据为87,第二阶段的贡献为85,两个阶段的贡献为69。第一阶段的平均年龄为38.0 +/- 18.5岁,平均臂围为28.0 +/- 1.9厘米,并且21%的人以前患有高血压。第一阶段的结果证实,套扎可使听诊血压测量值降低3.6 +/- 5.1 / 2.8 +/- 4.0 mm Hg(两者的P值<.0001)。对于第二阶段,平均年龄为39.3 +/- 18.3岁,平均臂围为28.0 +/- 1.9厘米,并且22%的人过去有高血压。大袖带的平均BP为112.2 +/- 13.1 / 67.8 +/- 7.3毫米汞柱,标准袖带的平均BP为117.8 +/- 13.3 / 71.2 +/- 7.1毫米汞柱(5.5 +/- 5.9 / 3.4 +/- 5.2袖带大时,mm Hg降低; P值<.0001)。袖带化导致示波法测量中临床上重要的向下偏差。应规定示波袖带的尺寸上限。 (C)2015年美国高血压学会。版权所有。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号