...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography: official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography >Clinical utility of guideline-based echocardiography: a prospective study of outpatient referral patterns at a tertiary care center.
【24h】

Clinical utility of guideline-based echocardiography: a prospective study of outpatient referral patterns at a tertiary care center.

机译:基于指南的超声心动图的临床实用性:对三级护理中心门诊转诊模式的前瞻性研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: The spread of echocardiography has increased the number of requests for echocardiography and the length of patient waiting lists in National Health Systems. This overuse of echocardiography may also result in a decrease in examination quality because of an excess in workload. The recommended use of guidelines for the requesting of echocardiograms could reduce the demand for this investigation and thus reduce both workload and health care costs. METHODS: In a prospective study of 520 outpatients in a large tertiary referral center, we analyzed adherence by family physicians and cardiovascular specialists to published guidelines for requesting echocardiograms; the use of a written indication justifying the request for the first and subsequent examinations; the diagnostic outcome; and the clinical utility of each echocardiogram performed. RESULTS: Most echocardiograms (72%) were requested by specialists, follow-ups were frequent (72%), and 14% of these proved normal. Among first examinations, 49% of those requested by family physicians and 36% of those requested by specialists were normal (P = not significant [NS]); in both groups 27% of the requests lacked a written indication. Family physicians requested echocardiograms chiefly for arterial hypertension, palpitations, chest pain, and valve disease, whereas specialists most often requested echocardiograms for checking valve prostheses, ischemic heart disease, and valve disease. The rate of adherence to guidelines (54% vs 52%, P = NS) and clinical utility (60% vs 61%, P = NS) was low and similar for family physicians and specialists. Provision of a written indication for the examination by the requesting physician correlated strongly to the clinical utility of the test (P < .001), and adherence of indication to guidelines was the major determinant of clinical utility at logistic regression analysis (P < .001). CONCLUSION: The rate of adherence to guidelines was lower than desirable and similar for family physicians and cardiovascular specialists. Adherence to guidelines and provision of a written specific indication strongly enhanced the value of the echocardiographic investigation.
机译:背景:超声心动图的普及增加了超声心动图的请求数量,并增加了国家卫生系统中患者的等候名单。由于工作量过多,超声心动图的过度使用也可能导致检查质量下降。建议使用要求超声心动图的指南可以减少对此检查的需求,从而减少工作量和医疗保健成本。方法:在大型三级转诊中心对520名门诊患者进行的一项前瞻性研究中,我们分析了家庭医生和心血管专家对已发布的要求超声心动图检查的指南的依从性;使用书面说明来证明第一次和以后的检查的要求;诊断结果;以及每次执行的超声心动图的临床效用。结果:大多数超声心动图(72%)是专家要求的,经常随访(72%),其中14%证明是正常的。在第一次检查中,家庭医生要求的检查占49%,专家要求的检查占36%(P =不显着[NS]);在这两组中,有27%的请求没有书面说明。家庭医生主要要求对动脉高血压,心,胸痛和瓣膜疾病进行超声心动图检查,而专家通常要求超声心动图检查瓣膜假体,缺血性心脏病和瓣膜疾病。遵循指南的比率(54%vs 52%,P = NS)和临床效用(60%vs 61%,P = NS)的比率很低,与家庭医生和专家相似。提供由请求医师进行检查的书面指征与该测试的临床效用密切相关(P <.001),并且对指示的坚持是对数回归分析中临床效用的主要决定因素(P <.001) )。结论:对指南的遵守率低于家庭医生和心血管专家的期望值,与之相似。遵守指南并提供书面的具体说明,可以大大提高超声心动图检查的价值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号