...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography: official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography >Accuracy of mitral valve area measurements using transthoracic rapid freehand 3-dimensional scanning: comparison with noninvasive and invasive methods.
【24h】

Accuracy of mitral valve area measurements using transthoracic rapid freehand 3-dimensional scanning: comparison with noninvasive and invasive methods.

机译:使用经胸快速徒手3维扫描进行二尖瓣面积测量的准确性:与无创和有创方法的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: The feasibility and accuracy of direct transthoracic 3-dimensional (3D) mitral valve area (MVA) measurements obtained using freehand scanning was investigated in patients with mitral stenosis. METHODS: A total of 30 patients (26 women, 4 men; aged 55 +/- 13 years) underwent a 2-dimensional (2D) and Doppler study 1 hour before percutaneous balloon mitral valvuloplasty. Transthoracic freehand data were acquired using a magnetic receiver attached to a broadband transducer, gated to electrocardiography and respiration. Volumetric MVA measurements from the left ventricle and left atrium were obtained and compared with MVA measurements derived from 2D planimetry, pressure half-time, and proximal isovelocity surface area. Invasive Gorlin MVA measurements were the gold standard for comparison. RESULTS: In all, 29 patients (97%) had 3D data allowing MVA measurements. Direct 3D measurements from the left ventricle had the least bias (0.06 +/- 0.19 cm(2)) and tightest limits of agreement (-0.44 to 0.32) compared with left atrium measurements (0.17 +/- 0.25 cm(2) and -0.67 to 0.33, respectively). The proximal isovelocity surface area method (bias: 0.09 +/- 0.34 cm(2)) was the most accurate of all 2D methods followed by pressure half-time (0.17 +/- 0.36 cm(2)) and planimetry (0.21 +/- 0.29 cm(2)). CONCLUSION: Direct 3D MVA measurements from the left ventricle using transthoracic freehand scanning are more accurate than traditional 2D methods.
机译:目的:研究徒手扫描获得的直接经胸3维(3D)二尖瓣面积(MVA)测量的可行性和准确性。方法:总共30例患者(26名女性,4名男性;年龄55 +/- 13岁)在经皮球囊二尖瓣成形术前1小时接受了二维(2D)和多普勒研究。经胸徒手数据是使用连接到宽带换能器的磁接收器采集的,门控到心电图和呼吸。获得了来自左心室和左心房的体积MVA测量值,并将其与源自2D平面测量,压力半衰期和近端等速表面积的MVA测量值进行了比较。侵入性Gorlin MVA测量是比较的金标准。结果:总共有29名患者(97%)具有3D数据,可以进行MVA测量。与左心房测量值(0.17 +/- 0.25 cm(2)相比,来自左心室的直接3D测量值具有最小的偏差(0.06 +/- 0.19 cm(2))和最严格的一致性限制(-0.44至0.32)。分别为0.67至0.33)。在所有2D方法中,近端等速表面积法(偏差:0.09 +/- 0.34 cm(2))是最准确的,其次是压力半时(0.17 +/- 0.36 cm(2))和平面法(0.21 + / -0.29厘米(2))。结论:经胸手绘扫描从左心室直接进行3D MVA测量比传统2D方法更准确。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号