...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical chiropractic >Attitudes of chiropractors to evidence-based practice and how this compares to other healthcare professionals: A qualitative study
【24h】

Attitudes of chiropractors to evidence-based practice and how this compares to other healthcare professionals: A qualitative study

机译:脊医对循证实践的态度以及与其他医疗保健专业人员的对比:定性研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Introduction: Evidence-based practice is now becoming accepted as the standard modality in the NHS and the allied healthcare professions. This study explores chiropractors' attitudes towards EBP, the barriers they face and how this compares to other professions.Methods: Seven field chiropractors were interviewed by the author; the interviews were semi-structured, audio recorded and later transcribed. These transcriptions were systematically evaluated using a data analysis software package to identify thematic categories in the chiropractors' narratives.Results: Research was considered to be an integral part of the future of the profession by all; however, the influence that research has upon daily practice was perceived to be limited. Sourcing research was not routinely undertaken and the ability and confidence to evaluate research was low. Current research was deemed to lack true representation of many clinical experiences and therefore was considered not relevant to practice life in many aspects.Conclusion: This study does not show these chiropractors to be anymore disadvan-taged to certain other healthcare professionals in educational skills when considering EBP. Nor does it show that these chiropractors are, in theory, less willing to adopt an EBP than other healthcare professions. They are similar to their counterparts in terms of not bearing this out on occasions. However, a larger study would have to be carried out to establish if these chiropractors are representative of the wider chiropractic profession before similarities could be draw between chiropractors and other healthcare professionals.
机译:简介:循证实践现已成为NHS和相关医疗行业的标准方式。这项研究探讨了脊医对EBP的态度,他们面临的障碍以及与其他专业的比较。方法:作者采访了七名现场脊医。访谈是半结构化的,有音频记录,以后再转录。使用数据分析软件包对这些转录进行了系统的评估,以确定脊医的叙述中的主题类别。结果:研究被所有人视为该行业未来不可或缺的一部分;然而,人们认为研究对日常实践的影响是有限的。采购研究不是常规性的,评估研究的能力和信心很低。当前的研究被认为缺乏许多临床经验的真实体现,因此被认为与实践生活在许多方面都没有关系。结论:本研究并未显示这些脊椎治疗师在考虑其他教育技能时不再对某些其他医疗保健专业人员不利EBP。从理论上讲,也没有显示这些脊医比其他医疗保健行业更不愿意采用EBP。他们与同行类似,只是偶尔不这样做。但是,在脊医和其他医疗保健专业人员之间可能会得出相似性之前,必须进行更大的研究,以确定这些脊医是否可以代表更广泛的脊椎治疗专业。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号