首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American College of Surgeons >Comparison of mortality risk adjustment using a clinical data algorithm (American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program) and an administrative data algorithm (Solucient) at the case level within a single institution.
【24h】

Comparison of mortality risk adjustment using a clinical data algorithm (American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program) and an administrative data algorithm (Solucient) at the case level within a single institution.

机译:使用临床数据算法(美国外科医生学院美国国家外科手术质量改进计划)和行政数据算法(Solucient)在单个机构中的病例级别比较死亡率风险调整。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: There is great interest in efficiently evaluating health care quality, but there is controversy over the use of administrative versus clinical data methods. We sought to compare actual mortality with risk-adjusted expected mortality in a sample population calculated by two different methods; one based on preexisting administrative records and one based on chart reviews. STUDY DESIGN: We examined a sample of patients (n = 1,234) undergoing surgical procedures at an academic teaching hospital during 1 year. The first risk-adjustment method was that used by the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, which is based on dedicated medical record review. The second method was that used by Solucient, LLC, which is based on preexisting administrative records. RESULTS: The ratio of observed to expected mortality for this population set was higher using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program algorithm (1.1; 95% CI, 0.8 to 1.5) than using the Solucient algorithm (0.9; 95% CI, 0.6 to 1.2) but neither estimate was notably different from 1.0. Similarly, when observed to expected mortality ratios were calculated separately for each quartile of mortality, there were no marked differences within quartiles, although minor differences with potential importance were noted. Fit was comparable by age categories, gender, and American Society of Anesthesiologists' categories. A number of actual deaths had higher predicted mortality scores using the Solucient algorithm. CONCLUSIONS: Risk-adjusted mortality estimates were comparable using administrative or clinical data. Minor performance differences might still have implications. Because of the potential lower cost of using administrative data, this type of algorithm can be an efficient alternative and should continue to be investigated.
机译:背景:人们对有效评估医疗保健质量非常感兴趣,但是在管理数据与临床数据方法的使用方面存在争议。我们试图将通过两种不同方法计算出的样本人群的实际死亡率与风险调整后的预期死亡率进行比较。一种基于既有的行政记录,另一种基于图表审查。研究设计:我们检查了样本的患者(n = 1,234)在一年的教学医院接受外科手术。第一种风险调整方法是“国家手术质量改善计划”所采用的方法,该方法基于专门的病历审查。第二种方法是Solucient,LLC使用的方法,该方法基于预先存在的管理记录。结果:使用国家手术质量改善计划算法(1.1; 95%CI,0.8到1.5)比使用Solucient算法(0.9; 95%CI,0.6到1.2)时,该人群的观察到的预期死亡率之比更高。但两者的估算值均与1.0并无显着差异。同样,当分别计算每个死亡率的四分位数与预期死亡率的比率时,四分位数之间没有显着差异,尽管注意到存在潜在重要性的微小差异。根据年龄类别,性别和美国麻醉医师学会的类别,Fit可比。使用Solucient算法,许多实际死亡具有较高的预测死亡率得分。结论:使用行政或临床数据,风险调整后的死亡率估算值是可比的。较小的性能差异可能仍会产生影响。由于使用管理数据的成本可能较低,因此这种算法可以作为一种有效的替代方法,应继续进行研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号