首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American College of Cardiology >Effectiveness of in-laboratory high-dose clopidogrel loading versus routine pre-load in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: results of the ARMYDA-5 PRELOAD (Antiplatelet therapy for Reduction of MYocardial Damage during Angioplasty) randomized trial.
【24h】

Effectiveness of in-laboratory high-dose clopidogrel loading versus routine pre-load in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: results of the ARMYDA-5 PRELOAD (Antiplatelet therapy for Reduction of MYocardial Damage during Angioplasty) randomized trial.

机译:实验室内大剂量氯吡格雷负荷与常规预负荷在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者中的有效性:ARMYDA-5 PRELOAD(抗血小板疗法可减少血管成形术中心肌损伤)的随机试验结果。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate safety and effectiveness of in-laboratory (in-lab) 600-mg clopidogrel loading pre-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) versus routine 6-h pre-load. BACKGROUND: Clopidogrel pre-treatment significantly improves outcome in patients undergoing PCI; however, efficacy of an in-lab loading strategy before PCI after coronary angiography versus routine pre-load has not been fully characterized. METHODS: A total of 409 patients (39% with acute coronary syndrome) were randomized to receive a 600-mg clopidogrel loading dose 4 to 8 h before PCI (pre-load group, n = 204) or a 600-mg loading dose given in the catheterization lab after coronary angiography, but prior to PCI (in-lab group, n = 205). Primary end point was 30-day incidence of major adverse cardiac events: cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), or unplanned target vessel revascularization. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in primary end point between the 2 randomization arms (8.8% in-lab vs. 10.3% pre-load; p = 0.72); this was mainly driven by periprocedural MI (8.8% vs. 9.3%, p = 0.99). No increased risk of bleeding or vascular complications was observed in the pre-load arm (5.4% vs. 7.8%; p = 0.42). As determined by the VerifyNow assay (Accumetrics, San Diego, California), patients in the in-lab group showed higher platelet reactivity during PCI and 2 h after intervention versus those in the pre-load arm (p < or = 0.043). CONCLUSIONS: ARMYDA-5 PRELOAD (Antiplatelet therapy for Reduction of MYocardial Damage during Angioplasty) trial indicates that a strategy of 600-mg in-lab clopidogrel load pre-PCI may have similar clinical outcomes as routine 4- to 8-h pre-load. Thus, when indicated, in-lab clopidogrel administration can be a safe alternative to routine pre-treatment given before knowing patients' coronary anatomy.
机译:目的:本研究旨在评估实验室内(实验室内)600 mg氯吡格雷负荷,常规经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)与常规负荷6h的安全性和有效性。背景:氯吡格雷预处理可显着改善PCI患者的预后。然而,在冠状动脉造影后PCI之前实验室内负荷策略相对于常规预负荷的功效尚未得到充分表征。方法:总共409例患者(39%患有急性冠脉综合征)被随机分配在PCI前4至8小时接受氯吡格雷负荷剂量600 mg(预负荷组,n = 204)或给予600 mg负荷剂量在导管实验室中在冠状动脉造影之后但在PCI之前(实验室组,n = 205)。主要终点是主要不良心脏事件的30天发生率:心脏死亡,心肌梗塞(MI)或计划外的靶血管血运重建。结果:2个随机分组之间的主要终点没有显着差异(实验室中为8.8%,预负荷为10.3%; p = 0.72)。这主要是由围手术期心肌梗死引起的(8.8%vs. 9.3%,p = 0.99)。在预负荷组中未观察到出血或血管并发症的风险增加(5.4%比7.8%; p = 0.42)。如通过VerifyNow分析(Accumetrics,加利福尼亚州圣地亚哥)所确定的,实验室内组的患者在PCI期间和干预后2小时显示的血小板反应性高于预负荷组(p <或= 0.043)。结论:ARMYDA-5 PRELOAD(抗血小板疗法可减少血管成形术期间的心肌损伤)试验表明,PCI前600 mg实验室内氯吡格雷负荷治疗的策略可能具有与常规4至8 h预负荷相似的临床结果。因此,当有指示时,实验室内使用氯吡格雷可以是在了解患者的冠状动脉解剖结构之前进行常规预处理的一种安全替代方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号