首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American College of Cardiology >Measurements of carotid intima-media thickness and of interadventitia common carotid diameter improve prediction of cardiovascular events: Results of the IMPROVE (carotid intima media thickness [IMT] and IMT-progression as predictors of vascular events in a high risk European population) study
【24h】

Measurements of carotid intima-media thickness and of interadventitia common carotid diameter improve prediction of cardiovascular events: Results of the IMPROVE (carotid intima media thickness [IMT] and IMT-progression as predictors of vascular events in a high risk European population) study

机译:测量颈动脉内膜中层厚度和动脉间膜间常见颈动脉直径可改善对心血管事件的预测:IMPROVE(颈动脉内膜中层厚度[IMT]和IMT进展作为欧洲高危人群中血管事件的预测因子)的研究结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objectives: The goal of this study was to compare the performance of several measures of carotid intima-media thickness (C-IMT) as predictors of cardiovascular events (CVEs), and to investigate whether they add to the predictive accuracy of Framingham risk factors (FRFs). Background: Various markers of subclinical atherosclerosis have been identified as predictors of CVEs, but the most powerful variable is still under debate. Methods: A cohort study was carried out in 5 European countries. A total of 3,703 subjects (median age 64.4 years; 48% men) were followed-up for a median of 36.2 months, and 215 suffered a first CVE (incidence: 19.9/1,000 person-years). Results: All measures of C-IMT and the interadventitia common carotid artery diameter (ICCAD) were associated with the risk of CVEs, after adjustment for FRFs and therapies (all p 0.005). The average of 8 maximal IMT measurements (IMT mean-max) , alone or combined with ICCAD, classified events and non-events better than the common carotid mean IMT (net reclassification improvement [NRI]: +11.6% and +19.9%, respectively; both p 0.01). Compared with classification based on FRFs alone, the NRI resulting from the combination of FRFs+ICCAD+IMT mean-max was +12.1% (p 0.01). The presence of at least 1 plaque (maximum IMT 1.5 mm) performed significantly worse than composite IMTs that incorporated plaques (p 0.001). Adjusted Kaplan-Meier curves showed that individuals with a FRS = 22.6% (cohort average), and both IMT mean-max and ICCAD above the median, had a 6.5% risk to develop a CVE over 3 years versus a 3.4% risk for those with the same FRS, and both IMT mean-max and ICCAD below the median. Conclusions: A risk stratification strategy based on C-IMT and ICCAD as an adjunct to FRFs is a rational approach to prevention of cardiovascular disease.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是比较几种测量颈动脉内膜中层厚度(C-IMT)作为心血管事件(CVE)预测指标的效果,并调查它们是否有助于提高Framingham危险因素的预测准确性( FRF)。背景:亚临床动脉粥样硬化的各种标志物已被确定为CVE的预测因子,但最有力的变量仍在争论中。方法:在5个欧洲国家进行了队列研究。总共对3,703名受试者(中位年龄为64.4岁;男性为48%)进行了随访,中位时间为36.2个月,其中215名初次发生CVE(发生率:19.9 / 1,000人年)。结果:校正FRF和治疗后,所有C-IMT指标和腹膜间颈总动脉直径(ICCAD)均与CVE风险相关(所有p <0.005)。单独或与ICCAD结合使用的8个最大IMT测量值(IMT平均值-最大值)的平均值比普通颈动脉IMT的分类事件和非事件更好(净重分类改善[NRI]:分别为+ 11.6%和+ 19.9% ;均p <0.01)。与仅基于FRF的分类相比,FRF + ICCAD + IMT的均值-最大值相结合得出的NRI为+ 12.1%(p <0.01)。至少有1个斑块(最大IMT> 1.5 mm)的存在明显比并入斑块的复合材料IMT差(p <0.001)。调整后的Kaplan-Meier曲线显示,FRS = 22.6%(队列平均)且IMT均值和ICCAD均高于中位数的个体,在3年内发生CVE的风险为6.5%,而那些人群的风险为3.4%具有相同的FRS,并且IMT均值最大值和ICCAD均低于中位数。结论:基于C-IMT和ICCAD作为FRF的辅助手段的风险分层策略是预防心血管疾病的合理方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号