首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine: JABFM >Management of skin and soft tissue infections in community practice before and after implementing a 'best practice' approach: an Iowa Research Network (IRENE) intervention study.
【24h】

Management of skin and soft tissue infections in community practice before and after implementing a 'best practice' approach: an Iowa Research Network (IRENE) intervention study.

机译:在实施“最佳实践”方法之前和之后,在社区实践中管理皮肤和软组织感染:爱荷华州研究网络(IRENE)干预研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

CONTEXT: Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) is a major pathogen among skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs). Most CA-MRSA infections are managed initially on an outpatient basis. It is critical that primary care clinicians recognize and appropriately treat patients suspected of having such infections. OBJECTIVE: To identify and evaluate best methods and procedures for primary care clinicians to manage skin and soft tissue infections. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Preintervention/postintervention study in eight Iowa Research Network offices conducted between October 2007 and August 2010. We reviewed medical records of 216 patients with SSTI before a set of interventions (preintervention) and 118 patients after the intervention (postintervention). INTERVENTIONS: Included a focus group meeting at each office, distribution of a modified Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) algorithm, "Outpatient Management of MRSA Skin and Soft Tissue Infections," education handouts, and an office policy for patients with skin infections. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportion of subjects who were prescribed an antibiotic that would cover MRSA at the initial visit and proportion who were prescribed an antibiotic that would cover MRSA at any time. RESULTS: Three hundred sixty-eight forms (244 preintervention and 124 postintervention) were returned; 216 (89%) preintervention forms and 118 (95%) postintervention forms were usable. Multivariable logistic regression models found statistically significant and independent factors associated with MRSA coverage at the initial visit included being in the postintervention rather than the preintervention group, having an abscess component compared with cellulitis alone, having a culture sent, being prescribed two or fewer antibiotics, and not being hospitalized. CONCLUSIONS: The CDC algorithm was feasible for offices to use. Following a discussion of SSTI management in the outpatient setting, use of MRSA coverage increased both initially and overall. Thus, involving clinicians in a discussion about guidelines rather than simply providing guidelines or a didactic session may be a useful way to change physician practices.
机译:背景:社区获得的耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(CA-MRSA)是皮肤和软组织感染(SSTI)中的主要病原体。大多数CA-MRSA感染最初是在门诊治疗。初级保健临床医生必须识别并适当治疗怀疑患有此类感染的患者,这一点至关重要。目的:为初级保健临床医生确定和评估最佳方法和程序,以管理皮肤和软组织感染。设计,地点和患者:2007年10月至2010年8月在爱荷华州研究网络的八个办公室进行的干预前/干预后研究。我们审查了一组干预措施(干预前)和干预措施干预后(干预后)的216例SSTI患者的病历。 )。干预措施:包括在每个办公室举行的焦点小组会议,分发经过修改的疾病控制和预防中心(CDC)算法,“ MRSA皮肤和软组织感染的门诊管理”,教育资料以及针对皮肤感染患者的办公室政策。主要观察指标:在初次就诊时使用可覆盖MRSA的抗生素的受试者比例和在任何时候都可覆盖MRSA的抗生素的比例。结果:368份表格(干预前为244份,干预后为124份)。可以使用216种(89%)的干预前形式和118种(95%)的干预后形式。多变量logistic回归模型发现,在初次就诊时与MRSA覆盖率相关的统计学上显着且独立的因素包括在干预后而不是干预前组,与单独的蜂窝织炎相比,脓肿的组成部分,传出的培养物,处方了两种或两种以下抗生素,不用住院结论:CDC算法对于办公室使用是可行的。在门诊环境中对SSTI管理进行讨论之后,MRSA覆盖率的使用在最初和总体上都有所增加。因此,让临床医生参与有关指南的讨论,而不是简单地提供指南或教学会议,可能是改变医师做法的有用方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号