首页> 外文期刊>Journal of studies on alcohol >Using calculations to estimate blood alcohol concentrations for naturally occurring drinking episodes: a validity study.
【24h】

Using calculations to estimate blood alcohol concentrations for naturally occurring drinking episodes: a validity study.

机译:使用计算来估计自然发生的饮酒发作的血液酒精浓度:有效性研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to determine the accuracy of retrospective estimated blood alcohol concentrations (eBACs) for re-creating intoxication resulting from a naturally occurring drinking event. This study identified five eBAC equations, applied them to self-report data and compared the results to actual blood alcohol concentration obtained by a breath test. METHOD: A convenience sample of 109 drinkers was recruited near drinking establishments and asked to provide breath alcohol concentration (BrAC) samples. Participants were contacted by telephone on the next waking day to gather data required for five algorithms that determine eBAC. BrAC and eBAC obtained from each equation were compared to determine the level of agreement between the two approaches. RESULTS: eBACs correlated highly with each other (r > or = 0.99); R2 for all algorithms ranged from 0.54 to 0.55 with BrAC as the criterion. On average, eBAC equations overestimated BrAC. Regression analysis identified the amount of time spent drinking, number of standard drinks, weight and year in school as factors related to discrepancy. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that, although all equations produce eBACs that are highly related, their relationship to BrAC does vary across equations. Using the best fitting equation, eBAC is more strongly correlated with BrAC when intoxication is less than 0.08 g/210 L of breath, and the magnitude of the relationship decreases as intoxication rises.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是确定回顾性估计的血液酒精浓度(eBAC)对由自然发生的饮酒事件引起的中毒再制造的准确性。这项研究确定了五个eBAC方程,并将其应用于自我报告数据,并将结果与​​通过呼气测试获得的实际血液酒精浓度进行了比较。方法:在饮酒场所附近收集了109名饮酒者的便利样本,并要求他们提供呼吸酒精浓度(BrAC)样本。在第二天清晨,通过电话与参与者联系,以收集确定eBAC的五种算法所需的数据。比较从每个方程式获得的BrAC和eBAC,以确定两种方法之间的一致性水平。结果:eBAC之间高度相关(r>或= 0.99);以BrAC为标准,所有算法的R2范围从0.54到0.55。平均而言,eBAC方程高估了BrAC。回归分析确定了喝酒时间,标准饮料数量,体重和上学时间是与差异有关的因素。结论:这些数据表明,尽管所有方程产生的eBAC都高度相关,但它们与BrAC的关系在各个方程中确实有所不同。使用最佳拟合方程,当中毒少于0.08 g / 210 L呼吸时,eBAC与BrAC的相关性更高,并且随着中毒程度的增加,这种关系的强度会降低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号