首页> 外文期刊>Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases: The official journal of National Stroke Association >Early recovery and better evacuation rate in neuroendoscopic surgery for spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage using a multifunctional cannula: preliminary study in comparison with craniotomy.
【24h】

Early recovery and better evacuation rate in neuroendoscopic surgery for spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage using a multifunctional cannula: preliminary study in comparison with craniotomy.

机译:使用多功能插管的自发性脑出血的神经内镜手术的早期恢复和更好的撤离率:与开颅手术相比的初步研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Neuroendoscopy is a promising therapeutic option for spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). We sought to compare the clinical outcomes between neuroendoscopic surgery and craniotomy for spontaneous ICH. We retrospectively analyzed the clinical and radiographic data of 43 patients treated with 23 neuroendoscopic procedures (endoscopy group) and 20 microsurgical procedures (craniotomy group). Rebleeding rate, surgical complications, and/or death were identified as primary clinical endpoints during the 2-month postoperative follow-up period. Evacuation rate, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score at day 7, and Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) score were compared as well. A composite primary endpoint was observed in 5 cases (11.6%), including 1 postoperative death in the endoscopy group (4.3%) and 4 postoperative deaths in the craniotomy group (20.0%). No rebleeding was observed in the endoscopy group. The evacuation rate was significantly higher in the endoscopy group compared with the craniotomy group (99.0% vs 95.9%; P < .01). Mean GCS score at day 7 was 12 for the endoscopy group and 9.1 for the craniotomy group (P < .05). The mean change in GCS score was +4.8 for the endoscopy group and -0.1 for the craniotomy group (P < .001). Our data indicate that in patients with ICH, endoscopic surgery is safe and feasible, and may promote earlier recovery. Our results warrant a future prospective, randomized, controlled efficacy trial.
机译:神经内窥镜检查是自发性脑出血(ICH)的有前途的治疗选择。我们试图比较神经内镜手术和开颅手术治疗自发性ICH的临床结果。我们回顾性分析了43例接受23例神经内镜手术(内窥镜检查组)和20例显微外科手术(颅骨切开手术组)治疗的患者的临床和影像学资料。在术后2个月的随访期间,再出血率,手术并发症和/或死亡被确定为主要临床终点。还比较了第7天的疏散率,格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)得分和格拉斯哥成果量表(GOS)得分。观察到5例患者(11.6%)的复合主要终点,包括在内窥镜检查组中有1例术后死亡(4.3%)和开颅手术组中有4例术后死亡(20.0%)。在内窥镜检查组中未观察到再出血。与开颅手术组相比,内窥镜检查组的疏散率显着更高(99.0%vs 95.9%; P <.01)。内窥镜检查组在第7天的GCS平均得分为12,开颅手术组为9.1(P <.05)。内窥镜检查组的GCS评分平均变化为+4.8,开颅手术组的平均变化为-0.1(P <.001)。我们的数据表明,对于患有ICH的患者,内窥镜手术是安全可行的,并且可以促进早期康复。我们的结果保证了未来的前瞻性,随机,对照疗效试验。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号