...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of strength and conditioning research >RESPONSIVENESS OF THE DOUBLE LIMB LOWERING TEST AND LOWER ABDOMINAL MUSCLE PROGRESSION TO CORE STABILIZATION EXERCISE PROGRAMS IN HEALTHY ADULTS: A PILOT STUDY
【24h】

RESPONSIVENESS OF THE DOUBLE LIMB LOWERING TEST AND LOWER ABDOMINAL MUSCLE PROGRESSION TO CORE STABILIZATION EXERCISE PROGRAMS IN HEALTHY ADULTS: A PILOT STUDY

机译:双腿放脂试验和腹部腹部下部锻炼对健康成人核心稳定锻炼计划的响应:一项初步研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Haladay, DE, Miller, SJ, Challis, JH, and Denegar, CR. Responsiveness of the double limb lowering test and lower abdominal muscle progression to core stabilization exercise programs in healthy adults: A pilot study. J Strength Cond Res 28(7): 1920-1927, 2014-Low back pain (LBP) is one of the most prevalent and expensive health care problems in the United States. Studies suggest that stabilization exercise may be effective in the management of people with LBP. To accurately assess the effect of stabilization programs on muscle performance, clinicians need an objective measure that is both valid and reliable. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the double limb lowering test (DLLT) and lower abdominal muscle progression (LAMP) can detect a change in abdominal muscle performance after stabilization exercises. Eleven healthy participants (4 men and 7 women) were randomly assigned to either a specific stabilization exercise (SSE) or general stabilization exercise (GSE) group and were evaluated by the DLLT and LAMP before, during, and at the end of 8 weeks of training. Subjects attended exercise sessions twice per week over 8 weeks. No significant difference in pretest performance existed between the 2 groups. No significant difference was detected with the DLLT for either the SSE or GSE over time or when groups were combined. The LAMP detected a significant difference for the combined groups and GSE but not SSE over time. These data indicate that the LAMP is sensitive to change after a spinal stabilization program, whereas the DLLT does not detect a change after these programs. Furthermore, the GSE was more effective in producing these changes. Additional testing of these assessments is necessary to further validate these tests and to identify specific populations for which these tests may be most appropriate.
机译:哈拉迪(Haladay,DE),米勒(Miller),SJ,贾里斯(Challis),JH和德尼加(Denegar),CR。健康成年人的双肢降低测试和下腹部肌肉对核心稳定锻炼程序的反应性:一项试点研究。 J Strength Cond Res 28(7):1920-1927,2014-低腰痛(LBP)是美国最普遍和最昂贵的医疗保健问题之一。研究表明,稳定锻炼可能对LBP患者的治疗有效。为了准确评估稳定程序对肌肉性能的影响,临床医生需要一种既有效又可靠的客观措施。这项研究的目的是确定双肢降低测试(DLLT)和下腹部肌肉运动(LAMP)是否可以检测到稳定运动后腹部肌肉性能的变化。 11名健康参与者(4名男性和7名女性)被随机分配到特定的稳定锻炼(SSE)或一般稳定锻炼(GSE)组,并在DLL的8周之前,期间和结束时通过DLLT和LAMP进行评估。训练。受试者在8周内每周两次参加运动。两组之间的测试前表现无显着差异。随时间推移或合并组时,对于SSE或GSE,DLLT均未检测到显着差异。随着时间的推移,LAMP检测到组合组和GSE的显着差异,但SSE却没有。这些数据表明,LAMP对脊柱稳定程序后的变化很敏感,而DLLT在这些程序后没有检测到变化。此外,GSE在产生这些变化方面更为有效。必须对这些评估进行额外的测试,以进一步验证这些测试并确定这些测试最适合的特定人群。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号