首页> 外文期刊>Clinical EEG and neuroscience: official journal of the EEG and Clinical Neuroscience Society (ENCS) >Sensory gating-out and gating-in in normal and schizophrenic participants
【24h】

Sensory gating-out and gating-in in normal and schizophrenic participants

机译:正常和精神分裂症患者的感觉门控和门控

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In contrast to sensory gating, the brain's ability to re-respond to relevant stimuli and the potential differences between healthy and schizophrenic participants have not been studied in great detail. Here, we explore what auditory paradigms are useful to measure this re-responding ability. Evoked potentials (EPs) were obtained from the Cz channel using 3 paired stimulus paradigms (pairs with equal stimuli {PE}, the second stimulus being lower {PL} or higher {PH} in frequency) and 2 short-train paradigms in which 5 identical stimuli were followed by a lower frequency stimulus (train lower {TL}) or higher frequency stimulus (train higher {TH}). Data were collected from 17 healthy control participants (NC) and 17 age and gender-matched patients with schizophrenia (SZ). Up to 4 data sets obtained on 4 different days were available for each participant. Ensemble averages were computed for each session, from which the P50, N100, and P200 latencies and amplitudes were obtained. No significant differences in amplitude or latency of the various EP components were found between the responses to the second stimulus obtained with the 5 paradigms. Neither did the responses to the fifth and sixth stimuli differ for the TL and TH paradigm, with the exception of the N100 latency of the fifth stimulus, which was longer for TH than TL for NC. Healthy participants had larger amplitudes and shorter latencies than the patients with schizophrenia for the responses to the first stimuli, with the latency differences continuing for the fifth and sixth response. Also, the amplitude and latency of the first response was larger than for the second response in both populations. In conclusion, none of the paradigms studied here, with the employed parameters, are useful to measure the re-responding ability of the brain. Also, the shorter latencies for the repeated stimulus suggest that the neural mechanism underlying attenuation of repeated stimuli is of a facilitating nature.
机译:与感觉门控相反,尚未对大脑对相关刺激做出反应的能力以及健康与精神分裂症参与者之间的潜在差异进行详细研究。在这里,我们探索哪些听觉范例对于衡量这种回应能力很有用。使用3个成对的刺激范例(具有相等刺激{PE}的配对,第二个刺激的频率较低{PL}或较高{PH})和2个短训练范例从Cz通道获得诱发电位(EPs)相同的刺激之后是较低频率的刺激(训练较低的{TL})或较高频率的刺激(训练较高的{TH})。数据收集自17位健康对照参与者(NC)和17位年龄和性别匹配的精神分裂症(SZ)患者。每个参与者最多可以在4个不同的日期获得4个数据集。为每个会话计算集合平均值,从而获得P50,N100和P200的延迟和幅度。在使用5种范式获得的对第二种刺激的反应之间,没有发现各种EP成分的振幅或潜伏期有显着差异。对于TL和TH范例,对第五和第六刺激的反应也没有不同,除了第五刺激的N100潜伏期,TH的延迟时间比NC的TL长。与精神分裂症患者相比,健康参与者对第一刺激的反应幅度更大,潜伏期较短,而第五和第六反应的潜伏期差异仍在继续。同样,在两个人群中,第一响应的幅度和潜伏期均大于第二响应。总之,此处研究的范式以及所采用的参数均不适用于测量大脑的反应能力。同样,重复刺激的潜伏期较短,表明重复刺激减弱的神经机制具有促进作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号