...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of separation science. >Ultrasound-assisted emulsification microextraction for the determination of ephedrines in human urine by capillary electrophoresis with direct injection. Comparison with dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction
【24h】

Ultrasound-assisted emulsification microextraction for the determination of ephedrines in human urine by capillary electrophoresis with direct injection. Comparison with dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction

机译:超声辅助乳化微萃取通过直接注射毛细管电泳测定人尿中的麻黄碱。与分散液-液微萃取的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Ultrasound-assisted emulsification microextraction and dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction were compared for extraction of ephedrine, norephedrine, and pseudoephedrine from human urine samples prior to their determination by capillary electrophoresis. Formation of a microemulsion of the organic extract with an aqueous solution (at pH 3.2) containing 10% methanol facilitated the direct injection of the final extract into the capillary. Influential parameters affecting extraction efficiency were systematically studied and optimized. In order to enhance the sensitivity further, field-amplified sample injection was applied. Under optimum extraction and stacking conditions, enrichment factors of up to 140 and 1750 as compared to conventional capillary zone electrophoresis were obtained resulting in limits of detection of 12-33 μg/L and 1.0-2.8 μg/L with dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction and ultrasound-assisted emulsification microextraction when combined with field-amplified sample injection. Calibration graphs showed good linearity for urine samples by both methods with coefficients of determination higher than 0.9973 and percent relative standard deviations of the analyses in the range of 3.4-8.2% for (n = 5). The results showed that the use of ultrasound to assist microextraction provided higher extraction efficiencies than disperser solvents, regarding the hydrophilic nature of the investigated analytes.
机译:比较了超声辅助乳化微萃取和液-液分散微萃取在通过毛细管电泳测定人尿液样品中提取麻黄碱,去氧麻黄碱和伪麻黄碱的方法。有机提取物与含有10%甲醇的水溶液(pH为3.2)形成微乳液,有助于将最终提取物直接注入毛细管中。对影响提取效率的影响参数进行了系统地研究和优化。为了进一步提高灵敏度,应用了场放大的样品进样。在最佳的提取和堆叠条件下,与常规毛细管区带电泳相比,富集系数最高可达140和1750,从而限制了采用分散液-液微萃取和质谱法检测12-33μg/ L和1.0-2.8μg/ L的极限。超声辅助乳化微萃取结合现场放大样品进样。两种方法的尿样的校准图均显示出良好的线性,测定系数高于0.9973,分析的相对标准偏差百分率在(n = 5)为3.4-8.2%的范围内。结果表明,就所研究的分析物的亲水性而言,使用超声辅助微萃取比分散剂溶剂具有更高的萃取效率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号