...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of radiological protection: Official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection >A comparison of shielding calculation methods for multi-slice computed tomography (CT) systems
【24h】

A comparison of shielding calculation methods for multi-slice computed tomography (CT) systems

机译:多层计算机断层扫描(CT)系统的屏蔽计算方法比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Currently in the UK, shielding calculations for computed tomography (CT) systems are based on the BIR-IPEM (British Institute of Radiology and Institute of Physics in Engineering in Medicine) working group publication from 2000. Concerns have been raised internationally regarding the accuracy of the dose plots on which this method depends and the effect that new scanner technologies may have. Additionally, more recent shielding methods have been proposed by the NCRP (National Council on Radiation Protection) from the USA. Thermoluminescent detectors (TLDs) were placed in three CT scanner rooms at different positions for several weeks before being processed. Patient workload and dose data (DLP: the dose length product and mAs: the tube current-time product) were collected for this period. Individual dose data were available for more than 95% of patients scanned and the remainder were estimated. The patient workload data were used to calculate expected scatter radiation for each TLD location by both the NCRP and BIR-IPEM methods. The results were then compared to the measured scattered radiation. Calculated scattered air kerma and the minimum required lead shielding were found to be frequently overestimated compared to the measured air kerma, on average almost five times the measured scattered air kerma.
机译:目前在英国,计算机断层扫描(CT)系统的屏蔽计算基于2000年以来的BIR-IPEM(英国放射学研究所和医学工程物理研究所)工作组发布。该方法所依赖的剂量图以及新扫描仪技术可能产生的效果。另外,来自美国的NCRP(全国辐射防护委员会)已经提出了更近的屏蔽方法。在进行处理之前,将热致发光检测器(TLD)放置在三个位于不同位置的CT扫描仪室内几周。在此期间收集患者的工作量和剂量数据(DLP:剂量长度乘积,mAs:管电流-时间乘积)。超过95%的患者可获取单独的剂量数据,并对其余患者进行估算。通过NCRP和BIR-IPEM方法,将患者工作负荷数据用于计算每个TLD位置的预期散射辐射。然后将结果与测得的散射辐射进行比较。与测量的空气比释动能相比,计算出的散射空气比释动能和最低要求的铅屏蔽被发现经常被高估,平均几乎是测量的散射式空气比释动能的五倍。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号