首页> 外文期刊>Journal of palliative medicine >Effects of a problem-solving intervention (COPE) on quality of life for patients with advanced cancer on clinical trials and their caregivers: simultaneous care educational intervention (SCEI): linking palliation and clinical trials.
【24h】

Effects of a problem-solving intervention (COPE) on quality of life for patients with advanced cancer on clinical trials and their caregivers: simultaneous care educational intervention (SCEI): linking palliation and clinical trials.

机译:解决问题的干预措施(COPE)对晚期癌症患者的生活质量的临床试验及其护理人员的影响:同期护理教育干预措施(SCEI):将缓解与临床试验联系起来。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

CONTEXT: Patients on investigational clinical trials and their caregivers experience poor quality of life (QOL), which declines as the disease progresses. OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of a standardized cognitive-behavioral problem-solving educational intervention on the QOL of patients enrolled on investigational clinical trials and their caregivers. DESIGN: Prospective, multi-institution, randomized trial. QOL was measured repeatedly over 6 months. PARTICIPANTS: Patients were simultaneously enrolled onto phase 1, 2, or 3 Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved cancer clinical trials. INTERVENTION: Intervention arm dyads participated in three conjoint educational sessions during the first month, learning the COPE problem solving model. Nonintervention arm dyads received usual care. OUTCOME MEASURES: Global QOL was measured by the City of Hope Quality of Life Instruments for Patients or Caregivers; problem solving skills were measured by the Social Problem Solving Inventory-Revised. RESULTS: The results are reported using the CONSORT statement. The analytic data set included 476 dyads including 1596 patient data points and 1576 care giver data points. Patient QOL showed no significant difference in the rate of change between the intervention and usual care arms (p = 0.70). Caregiver QOL scores in the intervention arm declined, but at less than half the rate in the control arm (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The COPE intervention enabled the average caregiver to come much closer to stable QOL over the 6-month follow-up. Future studies should enroll subjects much earlier in the cancer illness trajectory, a common patient/caregiver theme. The maximum effect was seen in caregivers who completed the 6-month follow-up, suggesting that the impact may increase over time.
机译:背景:正在进行临床研究试验的患者及其护理人员的生活质量(QOL)较差,但随着疾病的发展而下降。目的:探讨标准化的认知行为问题解决教育干预措施对参加临床研究试验的患者及其护理人员的生活质量的影响。设计:前瞻性,多机构,随机试验。在6个月内重复测量了生活质量。参与者:患者同时参加了机构审查委员会(IRB)批准的1、2或3期临床试验。干预:干预组在第一个月参加了三个联合教育会议,学习了COPE问题解决模型。非干预性二联体接受常规护理。观察指标:全球生活质量(QOL)由希望之城为患者或护理人员提供的生活质量仪器进行了测量;解决问题的技能由修订后的社会问题解决清单进行衡量。结果:使用CONSORT语句报告结果。分析数据集包括476个二元组,其中包括1596个患者数据点和1576个护理者数据点。患者的生活质量(QOL)显示干预组和常规护理组之间的变化率无显着差异(p = 0.70)。干预组的照顾者QOL得分下降,但低于对照组的一半(p = 0.02)。结论:在6个月的随访中,COPE干预使普通护理人员更加接近稳定的QOL。未来的研究应该使受试者更早地进入癌症疾病轨迹,这是患者/护理人员的共同主题。在完成6个月随访的看护人中看到了最大的效果,表明这种影响可能随着时间的推移而增加。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号