...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of palliative medicine >Race does not influence do-not-resuscitate status or the number or timing of end-of-life care discussions at a pediatric oncology referral center.
【24h】

Race does not influence do-not-resuscitate status or the number or timing of end-of-life care discussions at a pediatric oncology referral center.

机译:种族不会影响小儿科肿瘤转诊中心的“不复诊”状态或临终护理讨论的次数或时间。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND: End-of-life care (EOLC) discussions and decisions are common in pediatric oncology. Interracial differences have been identified in adult EOLC preferences, but the relation of race to EOLC in pediatric oncology has not been reported. We assessed whether race (white, black) was associated with the frequency of do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders, the number and timing of EOLC discussions, or the timing of EOLC decisions among patients treated at our institution who died. METHODS: We reviewed the records of 380 patients who died between July 1, 2001 and February 28, 2005. Chi(2) and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used to test the association of race with the number and timing of EOLC discussions, the number of DNR changes, the timing of EOLC decisions (i.e., DNR order, hospice referral), and the presence of a DNR order at the time of death. These analyses were limited to the 345 patients who self-identified as black or white. RESULTS: We found no association between race and DNR status at the time of death (p = 0.57), the proportion of patients with DNR order changes (p = 0.82), the median time from DNR order to death (p = 0.51), the time from first EOLC discussion to DNR order (p = 0.12), the time from first EOLC discussion to death (p = 0.33), the proportion of patients who enrolled in hospice (p = 0.64), the time from hospice enrollment to death (p = 0.2) or the number of EOLC discussions before a DNR decision (p = 0.48). CONCLUSION: When equal access to specialized pediatric cancer care is provided, race is not a significant factor in the presence or timing of a DNR order, enrollment in or timing of enrollment in hospice, or the number or timing of EOLC discussions before death.
机译:背景:临终护理(EOLC)的讨论和决策在儿科肿瘤学中很常见。在成人EOLC偏爱中已发现种族差异,但尚未报道儿科肿瘤学中种族与EOLC的关系。我们评估了种族(白色,黑色)是否与拒绝复诊(DNR)的频率,讨论EOLC的次数和时机,或在我们机构中死亡的患者中做出EOLC决定的时机有关。方法:我们回顾了2001年7月1日至2005年2月28日之间死亡的380例患者的记录。使用Chi(2)和Wilcoxon秩和检验来检验种族与EOLC讨论的次数和时机的相关性, DNR更改的数量,EOLC决定的时间(即DNR订单,临终关怀转诊)以及死亡时DNR订单的存在。这些分析仅限于345名自我识别为黑人或白人的患者。结果:我们发现种族与死亡时DNR状态之间无关联(p = 0.57),DNR次序变化的患者比例(p = 0.82),从DNR次序到死亡的中位时间(p = 0.51),从第一次EOLC讨论到DNR次序的时间(p = 0.12),从第一次EOLC讨论到死亡的时间(p = 0.33),加入临终关怀的患者比例(p = 0.64),从临终关怀到死亡的时间(p = 0.2)或DNR决定之前的EOLC讨论次数(p = 0.48)。结论:如果能够平等地获得专门的儿科癌症护理,种族对DNR秩序的存在或时机,临终关怀医院的入组或入学时间,或死亡前EOLC讨论的次数或时间不是重要因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号