首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Paleontology >Problematica, trace fossils, and tubes within the Ediacara Member (South Australia): Redefining the Ediacaran trace Fossil record one tube at a time
【24h】

Problematica, trace fossils, and tubes within the Ediacara Member (South Australia): Redefining the Ediacaran trace Fossil record one tube at a time

机译:Ediacara成员(南澳大利亚)内的Problemicala,痕迹化石和管子:重新定义Ediacaran痕迹化石一次记录一个管子

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Ediacaran trace fossils are becoming an increasingly less common component of the total Precambrian fossil record as structures previously interpreted as trace fossils are reinterpreted as body fossils by utilizing qualitative criteria. Two morphotypes, Form E and Form F of Glaessner (1969), interpreted as trace fossils from the Ediacara Member of the Rawnsley Quartzite in South Australia are shown here to be body fossils of a single, previously unidentified tubular constructional morphology formally described herein as Somatohelix sinuosus n. gen. n. sp. S. sinuosus is 2-7 mm wide and 3-14 cm long and is preserved as sinusoidal casts and molds on the base of beds. Well-preserved examples of this fossil preserve distinct body fossil traits such as folding, current alignment, and potential attachment to holdfasts. Nearly 200 specimens of this fossil have been documented from reconstructed bedding surfaces within the Ediacara Member. When viewed in isolated hand sample, many of these specimens resemble ichnofossils. However, the ability to view large quantities of reassembled and successive bedding surfaces within specific outcrops of the Ediacara Member provides a new perspective, revealing that isolated specimens of rectilinear grooves on bed bases are not trace fossils but are poorly preserved specimens of S. sinuosus. Variation in the quality and style of preservation of S. sinuosus on a single surface and the few distinct characteristics preserved within this relatively indistinct fossil also provides the necessary data required to define a taphonomic gradient for this fossil. Armed with this information, structures which have been problematic in the past can now be confidently identified as S. sinuosus based on morphological criteria. This suggests that the original organism that produced this fossil was a widespread and abundant component of the Ediacaran ecosystem.
机译:随着以前定性为痕迹化石的结构通过定性标准被重新解释为人体化石,Ediacaran痕迹化石正成为前寒武纪化石总记录中越来越少见的组成部分。 Glaessner(1969)的E型和F型两种形态型,被解释为南澳大利亚Rawnsley石英岩的Ediacara成员的痕迹化石,此处显示为单一的,先前未确认的管状构造形态的体化石,在本文中正式称为Somatohelix鼻窦gen。 。 sp。鼻窦链球菌(S. sinuosus)宽2-7毫米,长3-14厘米,被保存为正弦铸模和霉菌,形成于床底。保存完好的这种化石实例保留了独特的人体化石特征,例如折叠,当前排列以及对固定物的潜在附着。已从Ediacara成员内重建的地层表面记录了近200个这种化石的标本。当从孤立的手样本中观察时,这些标本中的许多都类似于鱼类化石。但是,能够查看埃迪卡拉成员特定露头内大量重新组装的和连续的层理表面的能力提供了新的视角,揭示了床基上直线槽的孤立标本不是痕迹化石,而是保存不佳的中华按蚊的标本。单一表面上中华绒螯蟹的保存质量和样式的变化,以及在这个相对模糊的化石中保存的几个不同的特征,也提供了定义该化石的垂线梯度所需的必要数据。有了这些信息,就可以根据形态学标准将过去有问题的结构可靠地鉴定为中华链球菌。这表明产生这种化石的原始生物是Ediacaran生态系统的一个广泛而丰富的组成部分。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号