...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical immunology: The official journal of the Clinical Immunology Society >Intratracheal administration to the lung enhances therapeutic benefit of an MBP peptide in the treatment of murine experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis.
【24h】

Intratracheal administration to the lung enhances therapeutic benefit of an MBP peptide in the treatment of murine experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis.

机译:气管内给予肺可增强MBP肽在治疗鼠类实验性自身免疫性脑脊髓炎中的治疗效果。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The treatment of autoimmune diseases by targeted down-regulation of autoantigen-specific cells has been accomplished by the administration of high doses of autoantigen. We performed direct comparisons between injection of myelin basic protein peptide and administration by several nonparenteral routes to determine whether route impacted benefit in the treatment of murine allergic encephalomyelitis, a model for multiple sclerosis. The range of effective peptide doses spanned over 1000-fold, and route of delivery played a major role in determining optimal dose. The oral route of administration was the least effective, requiring at least 50- to 100-fold more antigen than subcutaneous injection, which in turn required at least 10-fold more antigen than delivery of peptide to the lung using an intratracheal instillation. Intratracheal delivery was also considerably more effective than inhalation of peptide, and, unlike inhalation, resulted in obvious penetration of delivered material deep into the lung. The increase in therapeutic efficacy did not appear to result from slower systemic delivery of antigen. Accumulation of peptide on antigen presenting cells in the spleen and in the brain was less efficient using the intratracheal route of administration compared to subcutaneous injection, implicating a special role for the lung microenvironment in the induction of immune nonresponsiveness. Copyright 2000 Academic Press.
机译:通过给予高剂量的自身抗原,可以通过靶向下调自身抗原特异性细胞的表达来治疗自身免疫性疾病。我们进行了髓鞘碱性蛋白肽注射与通过几种非胃肠道途径给药之间的直接比较,以确定该途径是否影响了小鼠过敏性脑脊髓炎(一种多发性硬化的模型)的治疗效果。有效肽剂量范围超过1000倍,并且输送途径在确定最佳剂量中起着重要作用。口服给药的效果最差,需要比皮下注射多50到100倍的抗原,而皮下注射则比通过气管内滴注将肽递送到肺的抗原多至少10倍。气管内输送也比吸入肽有效得多,并且与吸入不同,它导致输送的材料明显渗透到肺部。治疗功效的增加似乎不是由于抗原的全身递送较慢所致。与经皮下注射相比,使用气管内给药途径在脾脏和大脑中的抗原呈递细胞上积聚肽的效率较低,这暗示了肺微环境在诱导免疫无反应性方面的特殊作用。版权所有2000学术出版社。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号