首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Rural Health >Communication and Mass Vaccination Strategies After Pertussis Outbreak in Rural Amish Communities-Illinois, 2009-2010
【24h】

Communication and Mass Vaccination Strategies After Pertussis Outbreak in Rural Amish Communities-Illinois, 2009-2010

机译:2009-2010年伊利诺伊州农村阿米什人社区百日咳暴发后的传播和大规模疫苗接种策略

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

PurposeDuring January 2010, 2 infants from an Amish community in east-central Illinois were hospitalized with pertussis. The local health department (LDH) intervened to control disease transmission, identify contributing factors, and determine best communications methods to improve vaccination coverage. MethodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted using public health surveillance data to determine the extent of the outbreak; the standard Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists case definition for pertussis was used. The standardized Illinois Department of Public Health pertussis patient interview form was used to collect demographic, symptom, vaccination history, and treatment history information. To control disease transmission, LDH staff worked with the Amish community to promote a vaccination campaign during February 6-April 30, 2010. FindingsForty-seven cases were identified, with onsets during December 2009-March 2010. Median age was 7 (interquartile range 1-12) years. Nineteen (40%) patients were male; 39 (83%) were aged <18 years; 37 (79%) had not received any pertussis-containing vaccine. Presenting symptoms did not differ substantially between vaccinated and unvaccinated patients. Duration of cough was longer among unvaccinated than vaccinated patients (32 vs 15.5 days, P = .002). Compared with vaccinated patients, proportionately more unvaccinated patients reported secondary household transmission (30% vs 72%; P = .012). Through enhanced vaccination campaigns, 251 (approximate to 10%) Amish community members were administered 254 pertussis-containing vaccines. ConclusionsTargeted health communication and outreach resulted in a successful vaccine campaign and long-running monthly vaccination clinic. Amish do not universally reject vaccines, and their practices regarding vaccination are not static.
机译:目的2010年1月,伊利诺伊州中东部一个阿米什人社区的2例婴儿因百日咳住院。当地卫生部门(LDH)进行了干预,以控制疾病的传播,确定影响因素并确定最佳的沟通方法以提高疫苗接种的覆盖率。方法采用公共卫生监测数据进行回顾性队列研究,以确定暴发的程度。使用了疾病控制和预防中心以及州和地区流行病学家委员会的百日咳病例定义。伊利诺伊州公共卫生部百日咳患者标准化访谈表用于收集人口统计,症状,疫苗接种史和治疗史信息。为了控制疾病传播,LDH员工在2010年2月6日至4月30日与阿米什人社区一起开展了疫苗接种运动。发现47例病例在2009年12月至2010年3月期间发病。中位年龄为7岁(四分位数范围1 -12年。 19名(40%)患者为男性; 39岁(83%)年龄小于18岁; 37名(79%)未接种任何百日咳疫苗。接种疫苗的患者和未接种疫苗的患者的症状无明显差异。未接种疫苗的患者咳嗽时间长于未接种疫苗的患者(32天vs 15.5天,P = 0.002)。与接种疫苗的患者相比,未接种疫苗的患者报告了次要家庭传播的比例更高(30%比72%; P = 0.012)。通过加强疫苗接种运动,向251名(约占10%)阿米什人社区成员注射了254种含百日咳的疫苗。结论有针对性的健康交流和外联使疫苗运动取得了成功,并且每月都有长期的疫苗接种诊所。阿米什人并不普遍拒绝疫苗,而且其疫苗接种做法也不是一成不变的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号