...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of refractive surgery >Comparison of optical aberrations and contrast sensitivity between aspheric and spherical intraocular lenses.
【24h】

Comparison of optical aberrations and contrast sensitivity between aspheric and spherical intraocular lenses.

机译:非球面和球面人工晶状体之间的光学像差和对比度灵敏度的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: To compare visual acuity, aberrometry, and contrast sensitivity in patients who had a spherical intraocular lens (IOL) (SoFlex SE, Bausch & Lomb) implanted in one eye and an aspheric IOL (SofPort AO, Bausch & Lomb) implanted in the fellow eye during uncomplicated cataract surgery. METHODS: A prospective, multicenter, double-blind study was performed. Forty patients (80 eyes) underwent bilateral phacoemulsification with implantation of a spherical IOL in one eye and an aspheric IOL in the fellow eye. Postoperatively, visual acuity, aberrometry, and contrast sensitivity tests were performed. Statistical analyses were performed using Student t and Wilcoxon tests, and mixed effects were used for each contrast condition situation. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients (30 women, 9 men; 78 eyes) with a mean age of 69.3+/-6.17 years (range: 51 to 82 years) completed the study. No statistical differences were found regarding visual acuity among eyes. Lower levels of higher order aberrations were achieved in the aspheric group. No statistical difference between groups under photopic conditions was noted. In low spatial frequencies, better performance was observed with the aspheric IOL under mesopic conditions. In high spatial frequencies, the spherical IOL produced better quality of vision. Comparing mesopic conditions with glare, visual performance was statistically better using the aspheric IOL. CONCLUSIONS: Cataract surgery results cannot be measured by means of visual acuity alone. Quality of vision must be considered, and implantation of IOLs with low levels of spherical aberrations and better contrast sensitivity are preferred. In this study, the aspheric IOL demonstrated better visual function, especially at night, when compared with spherical IOLs.
机译:目的:比较在一只眼中植入球面人工晶状体(IOL)(SoFlex SE,Bausch&Lomb)和非球面IOL(SofPort AO,Bausch&Lomb)的患者的视敏度,像差和对比度敏感性。单纯性白内障手术期间的另一只眼睛。方法:进行了一项前瞻性,多中心,双盲研究。 40例患者(80只眼)进行了双侧超声乳化手术,其中一只眼植入了球状人工晶体,另一只眼植入了非球面人工晶体。术后进行视力,像差和对比敏感度测试。使用Student t和Wilcoxon检验进行统计分析,并对每种对比情况使用混合效应。结果:39名患者(30名女性,9名男性; 78眼)平均年龄为69.3 +/- 6.17岁(范围:51至82岁),完成了研究。在眼睛之间的视敏度上未发现统计学差异。在非球面组中实现了较低水平的高阶像差。在明视条件下,各组之间无统计学差异。在低空间频率下,非球面IOL在介观条件下观察到更好的性能。在高空间频率下,球形IOL可产生更好的视觉质量。将中视条件与眩光进行比较,使用非球面IOL,视觉性能在统计学上更好。结论:白内障手术的结果不能仅凭视力来衡量。必须考虑视觉质量,并且首选植入低球差和更好的对比敏感度的IOL。在这项研究中,与球形IOL相比,非球面IOL表现出更好的视觉功能,尤其是在夜间。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号