首页> 外文期刊>Journal of rehabilitation medicine : >Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the fear-avoidance beliefs questionnaire: methodological aspects of the Norwegian version.
【24h】

Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the fear-avoidance beliefs questionnaire: methodological aspects of the Norwegian version.

机译:避免恐惧信念问卷的可靠性,效度和响应度:挪威语版本的方法论方面。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ) for use in Norwegian patients with low back pain. DESIGN: A prospective cohort study with 2 groups. PATIENTS: The questionnaire was tested in 123 patients with acute low back pain and 50 patients with chronic low back pain. METHODS: A translation and cross-cultural adaptation was performed. Test-retest reliability was assessed in 28 patients with chronic low back pain. Responsiveness was assessed in acute low back pain. RESULTS: Two factors for the FABQ were confirmed; fear-avoidance beliefs about work (FABQ-Work) and physical activity (FABQ-PA), accounting for 60% and 54% of the total variance in acute and chronic low back pain, respectively. For FABQ-Work and FABQ-PA internal consistency was 0.90 and 0.79, intra-class correlation coefficients 0.82 and 0.66, minimal detectable changes 12 and 9 points, and coefficients of variation were 16% and 23%. The FABQ correlated weakly to moderatelywith pain, disability, distress, and clinical variables. Standardized response means were low for FABQ-Work (0.32) and moderate (0.56) for FABQ-PA. Both FABQ subscales showed initially floor and/or ceiling effects. CONCLUSION: The Norwegian FABQ version had acceptable factor structure, internal consistency, test-retest reliability and construct validity. The responsiveness of the FABQ-Work was low, and for the FABQ-PA moderate, in the acute sample.
机译:目的:评估“恐惧避免信念问卷”(FABQ)在挪威下腰痛患者中的信度,效度和反应性。设计:前瞻性队列研究,分为两组。患者:该问卷在123例急性下腰痛患者和50例慢性下腰痛患者中进行了测试。方法:进行翻译和跨文化改编。对28例慢性下腰痛患者进行了重新测试信度的评估。评估了急性下腰痛的反应能力。结果:确认了FABQ的两个因素;对工作(FABQ-工作)和身体活动(FABQ-PA)的回避恐惧信念分别占急性和慢性下背痛总变异的60%和54%。对于FABQ-Work和FABQ-PA,内部一致性为0.90和0.79,组内相关系数为0.82和0.66,最小可检测变化为12和9点,变异系数为16%和23%。 FABQ与疼痛,残疾,困扰和临床变量之间存在弱相关或中等相关。对于FABQ-Work,标准响应方式较低(0.32),对于FABQ-PA,标准响应方式较低(0.56)。 FABQ的两个分量表最初都显示了地板和/或天花板的影响。结论:挪威FABQ版本具有可接受的因子结构,内部一致性,重测信度和结构效度。在急性样品中,FABQ-Work的反应性较低,而对于FABQ-PA为中等。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号