首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Petroleum Science & Engineering >Experimental investigation of miscible and immiscible Water-Alternating-Gas(WAG)process performance
【24h】

Experimental investigation of miscible and immiscible Water-Alternating-Gas(WAG)process performance

机译:混溶和不混溶的水交替气(WAG)工艺性能的实验研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Gas injection is the second largest enhanced oil recovery process,next only to thermal processes used in heavy oil fields.To increase the extent of the reservoir contacted by the injected gas,the gas is generally injected intermittently with water.This mode of injection,called water-alternating-gas(WAG),is being widely practiced in the oil fields.This experimental study is aimed at evaluating the performance of the WAG process as a function of gas-oil miscibility and brine composition.This performance evaluation has been carried out by comparing oil recoveries from WAG injection with those from continuous gas injection(CGI).Miscible floods were conducted at 17.24 MPa(2500 psi)and immiscible floods at 3.45 MPa(500 psi)using rock-fluids systems consisting of Berea cores,n-Decane and two different brines,namely the commonly used 5% NaCl solution and another being the multi-component reservoir brine from the Yates field in West Texas.The coreflood protocol consisted of a series of steps including brine saturation,absolute permeability determination,flooding with oil(drainage)to initial oil saturation,end-point oil permeability determination,flooding with brine(imbibition)to residual oil saturation,end-point water permeability determination,and finally,tertiary gas injection(in both continuous injection and WAG modes)to recover the waterflood residual oil.When oil recovery per unit volume of gas injection was used as a parameter to evaluate the floods,the WAG mode of injection out-performed the CGI.As expected the miscible floods were found to out-perform the immiscible floods.At increased volumes of gas injection,the performance of miscible CGI flood,in spite of the high injection pressure,approached that of the low-pressure immiscible floods.A change in brine composition from 5% NaCl to 0.926% multivalent brine from Yates reservoir showed a slight adverse effect on tertiary gas flood recovery due to increased solubility of CO_2 in the latter.The results of this study suggest that the optimum mode of gas injection is a combination process between CGI and WAG modes of gas injection.
机译:注气是第二大提高采收率的工艺,仅次于重油田中使用的热力工艺。为了增加注入的气与储层接触的程度,通常将天然气间歇性注入水。这种注入方式称为水替代气(WAG)在油田中得到了广泛应用。本实验研究旨在评估WAG工艺的性能与瓦斯油混溶性和盐水成分的关系。通过比较WAG注入和连续注气(CGI)的采收率。采用由Berea岩心组成的岩石流体系统,在17.24 MPa(2500 psi)下进行了混相驱,在3.45 MPa(500 psi)下进行了不混相驱。癸烷和两种不同的盐水,即常用的5%NaCl溶液,另一种是西得克萨斯州耶茨油田的多组分储层盐水。岩心驱替方案包括以下步骤:包括盐水饱和度,绝对渗透率确定,注油(排水)至初始油饱和度,终点油渗透率确定,盐水(吸收)驱油至残余油饱和度,终点水渗透率确定,最后是三次气体注入(在连续注入和WAG模式下)以回收注水残余油。当使用每单位体积注气的采油量作为评估驱替的参数时,WAG注入模式的表现优于CGI。在注气量增加的情况下,尽管注入压力较高,但混相CGI驱的性能却接近低压不混溶的驱油性能。盐水成分从5变为5。从Yates储层中提取NaCl到0.926%的多价盐水,由于后者中CO_2的溶解度增加,对三次气驱采收率显示了轻微的不利影响。本研究的结果是建议最佳的注气模式是CGI和WAG注气模式之间的组合过程。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号